Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John's avatar

So, if the plagues were a result of chemicals or some other environmental factor, how do you explain all the studies where they track down records and whatnot, then dig up bodies analyze bones and isolate different strains of bacteria/viruses through DNA?

What I mean is that it seems it has already been explained through countless independent studies, even with such specificity as to be able to track these tiny monsters' family trees and geographic origins. It stands to reason that it was microbes that caused it.

Granted, diseases flourish when times are tough. A comet or large enough volcanic eruption causing a dark cold couple of years could really throw everything out of wack. (And there is a lot of evidence of such disasters.) So it is obviously a contributing factor. But I posit that these natural disasters essentially made conditions perfect for a pandemic rather than being the actual plague.

Further, it would have to be a really big nasty space rock to be able to pollute the atmosphere to that level of concentration to make that many people sick over that large of an area. It surely would have left a huge chemical signature in things like bones trees and soil, etc. Where is the evidence?

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts