EXCLUSIVE - The next COVID will be a fake nuclear disaster.
Start stocking up on iodine, folks!
You heard it here first, folks. The next psy op will be a fake nuclear disaster.
We all know that the Great Reset didn´t begin or end with COVID. For the past year or so, we´ve all been asking ourselves what the next act of this absurd tragicomedy will be.
Well, Nevermore Media is calling it. Nope, it won`t be another super-serial Monkeypox variant or a fake alien invasion. It`ll be a fake nuclear disaster.
How do we know? We`re sungazers, that`s how. We absorb the light of God through our eyeballs, and it gives us magic powers.
(Hey, no one`s going to believe us anyway. Might as well have fun with this.)
Seriously, though, this article is not tongue-in-cheek, and will be the first in the series of articles in which our Balkan correspondent makes the case that the globalists are planning a fake nuclear disaster as part of a giant psy op based on the propaganda principle of ¨Problem-Reaction-Solution¨.
Although I expect that this post will raise more questions than it answers, I have resisted the urge to editorialize, and am publishing my comrade`s submission in its full inflammatory glory. I ask the reader to suspend their disbelief for a few minutes and ask themselves if this could possible be true.
If it is, Nevermore Media has officially altered the course of history, and I can die happy, knowing that I`ve fulfilled my life purpose of throwing a major wrench in the gears of the mega-machine.
If it`s not, meh, whatever, no one will remember this six months from now. Trust me, I`ve studied divination for years. People remember hits more than misses. So all you skeptics out there, no, I`m not drunk on my own Kool-Aid. I personally think that this theory is much more plausible than a fake alien invasion.
For those of you unfamiliar with this theory before, the idea is that a fake alien invasion would be a great way to bring in a one world government. The logic is that if all the nations of the world had a common enemy, it would be much easier to unite them under one military command.
Some of us have long joked that the COVID psy op was practice for the fake alien invasion, but many a true word is said in jest.
So, yes, dear reader, we are always kind of fucking with you, but our intention is to catalyze genuine illumination, and the fact that we`re fucking with you does not mean that we aren`t dead serious. The following expose is a case in point.
Start stocking up on iodine, folks. With crisis comes opportunity. We might as well get rich off them credulous smuggles this time around.
Oh man, I should probably quit with all the hate at some point, shouldn`t I?
N
Nuclear radiation is a new scamdemic
Any kind of sceptic has a weak side, a tendency to believe in some sort of fraud. Leftists were sceptic to governments, religions and big corporations until COVID came, but the fear of sickness paralysed their minds. Likewise, is there anything similar that could trick COVID sceptics too?
Unfortunately and undoubtedly yes, and this is at the moment the nuclear crisis. Many believe that after the plandemic failed, ¨they" will play the final card and destroy the world in a third world war. That belief contains an assumption that the organisers are somewhat impulsive lunatics, but I think history shows that we are dealing with more cold-minded types of people. They have been preparing things for decades and they are not in a hurry. Besides that, I will present evidence that they were planning the Ukraine crisis already before COVID. I will examine indications that they are about to bring a short-term nuclear crisis with a few deceptive goals. I am convinced they are NOT planning on starting WWIII at the moment.
First, let's look at the media language which tells us between the lines more or less everything we need to know. They are forecasting a „black swan" event in a typical manner of predictive programming, as it follows:
1.A drastic movie-like scenario is expected, although we wouldn't make the necessary logical connections to expect it ourselves, if someone hasn't pointed out the way to think. For example, in 2020. a flu-like virus appeared as it happens dozens of times every year, but this time experts were sure that it comes with a fatality rate of 20% and will destroy the whole society, if we don't. Now a second proxy war in Ukraine between Russia and NATO is taking place, among many other zones with the potential to escalate around the world, but somehow the most logical thing to expect is a nuclear disaster or a nuclear war. Why there was no imminent nuclear war in 2014, or already with Kim Jong Un who sends nuclear threats every second day? Why would they switch from conventional warfare to nuclear right now, after a decades of close enounters? So people got somehow caught into poor logic that nuclear war is a desired outcome or method for those politicians, but if we think about it calmly and know they are also psychopaths with long-term planning abilities and not impulsive hooligans, then there is no real reason to start a nuclear war. They have no reason to destroy the earth they are living on, the food they are eating (and they would surely be affected) possible annihilation of all of them, and more than that, a real nuclear war or disaster opens the door to a highly uncontrollable situation, and that is what they fear the most. On the other side, keeping people in fear of nuclear war and gaining control is a total win-win.
2.We see unknown experts popping out and making logical somersaults to explain us why the scenario is likely to happen and how. For example, until now a nuclear weapon use would in people's minds surely lead to nuclear war and mutual annihilation, but last year a new narrative emerged where politicians could use „tactical" nuclear weapons, smaller than ¨strategical" which should be taken with less fear and maybe not lead to an all-out nuclear war. If they have such a nuclear weapon they could play with less seriously, like a ¨casual" nuke, why haven`t they been using it for decades? And then the media tells that a tactical nuke is one up to 100 kilotons, although the biggest symbols of nuclear fear, the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, were only 20 kilotons explosions. Do you see how they`re playing with your mind? They want you to think that a bomb with up to five times more power than the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is no big deal.
Also, at least three MSM in the year 2022. repeated the sentence one after another that the ¨taboo of using nuclear weapons hasn't been broken, until now". Why they are talking from a position like it's already broken, although it isn't? Why there was a taboo all these years if it didn't have to be so, and why is it broken just now, and not sometimes before, in many cold war crises? Because that's they want with the upcoming events, not to destroy the world, but to „break the taboo". To make a footstep further in chaos and open a new chapter of fear.
3. ¨Experts" already know the course of events after the crisis and also its long-term implications on society. They already present a sociological analysis although the event itself even didn't happen yet. At the beginning of COVID they ¨knew" it will be the new normal and people will mask even after it. Now they are predicting two things:
One, if someone uses a nuclear weapon, it will not cause a reaction you would expect". In the past, we were instructed to think that one nuclear weapon use would surely bring a world's end, and now we are told to think the opposite. Media tells us, contrary to everything before, that in case of Putin dropping a nuke, the west could react more cold-minded and respond with economical sanctions, political pressure, or similarly with a „non-serious" nuke, instead of total destruction. So before they were lunatics with fingers on doomsday switch, but now they turned into Gandhis that will think twice or turn the other cheek?
And two, they already know that nuclear weapons will become a new normal. Kissinger says it will change radically a culture of war, and international politics. CFR says ¨the world is on the cusp of new era and nuclear weapons will play a bigger role". The Times is telling us that ¨the era of nuclear arms control is over". It is evident from the language that they are not announcing a sudden absolute destruction of the world, but a watered down lasting crisis which main goal is a constant threat, not one physical disaster itself.
SIGNS THAT IT WAS IN THE PLAN LONG TIME BEFORE
Besides media language, we can see other pretty solid indications that it was in their business plan before COVID. People should not fall into the trap to think that global scenarios can be prepared in few months, which should be the case if they just switched from COVID to Ukraine in 2021. Instead, we can see COVID was in plans at least from 2009. with the swine flu as its prelude, Olypmics opening in London 2012. as an announcement, different patents filled until 2020., and so on. So let's see what happened before the actual crisis:
-Predicitive programming on TV. There was a viral series Chernobyl from HBO in 2019., proclaimed one of the best series of all time on IMDB.
Besides that Russians made their movie about the topic too – Chernobyl 1986, and a movie about Fukushima was also released in 2020. and several more in years before.
The HBO series made it a thing, and the media was reporting that Chernobyl became a hotspot for global tourists. I remember friends totally uninterested in such topic suddenly becoming crazy about Pripiat, so it seems that propaganda worked. There was an increase in books published on the topic, and in my country specifically I can point out there was an increase in the translation of such books also. Oh, and let's not forget the widely announced Nolan's film about Oppenheimer which is to be released in July 2023.
-In different European countries (such as my homeland) legislation about nuclear emergencies was changed almost in secrecy in spring 2020., in the times of the hardest lockdowns and panic. Changes were passed in parliaments in silence and without much discussion. What made politicians throughout Europe to think about nuclear emergenices in the midst of the biggest pandemic in history? In my country specifically, authority upon dealing with the nuclear emergency was handled over from governmental bodies to the ministry of police, and in other occasions to civil protection ( remember their role during COVID )
-IAEA held a preparedness exercise called ConvEx-3 in UAE in 2021. Seventy-five countries and twelve international organisations were participating in a simulated nuclear power plant disaster whose result was a release of radioactive material into the atmosphere. Also, it would be worthy to mention that on the Muchen Security Conference in 2021., where monkeypox was ¨predicted¨ and discussed, one of the organisers was the Nuclear Threat Initiative. I would think of the possibility they were actually discussing something other than pandemics there, and later I will go further into a weird new merge of big pharma and nuclear actors.
-RAND Corporation, a well-known think tank published a strategic plan against Russia named „Overextending and unbalacing Russia" in 2019. It was presented in US Congress and predicted the sending of military aid to Ukraine, forcing Europe to stop importing gas from Russia and import it from USA, forcing Russian troops out of Pridnestrovie, encouraging domestic protests in Russia, and other – well before the Russian troops entered Ukraine.
-Escalation at the end of 2021., was a continuation of an escalation of winter and spring of 2021. (and 2014. Before that), thus we can see the story has been developed all the way parallel to the COVID story, deeply in time when it seemed that the plandemic could still go sucessful for them.
THE DISASTER'S SCENARIO
After concluding that something is sure to happen, it remains to see what exactly. They are also telling us the most on this subject themselves. The media is juggling with four scenarios during the whole time: 1) Nuclear power plant disaster, 2) Tactical nuclear weapon use, 3) Dirty bomb use and 4) Nuclear terrorism. Probably it depends on the course of events on the ground as well as in political sphere ( joining of Finalnad and Sweden to NATO and such ) which option will prevail. You can easily imagine the amount of panic that will spread in Europe after such an event, and if it's a part of someone's plan it would be wise to test this kind of situation first. Did they? During last months in Russia, there was a few examples of „hackers" hacking TV station and announcing that a nuclear attack has taken place, one of them just 2 weeks ago. Western media hasn't reported much on that. Anyway, after it happens, it will certainly become as „Schrodinger bomb" as James Corbett nicely named it – both sides will accuse each other equally of a false flag attack ( and they already are although it didn't happen yet ).
As I pointed out, there's not much reason why politicians would make a real radiological disaster, esecially if they could fake it. As in times of COVID, there are two strong arguments for that: first, it is often easier and less costly and the second, more important – a story that is happening only in media is highly controllable, whereas a real catastrophe can go in hundred undesired directions. Apparently, in Chernobyl series some characters were trying to measure the radiation themselves and were told by the experts that the level of radiation is not measurable, although still harmful. We have already seen a disease without symptoms, so we may soon witness a radiation that is not possible to measure.
And here comes the medical industry. We can see governments purchasing large amounts of anti-radiation pills, and others complaining there is not enough of it available. New companies are popping out and getting specialised in the field and the media is praising them ( sounds familiar?). Interestingly enough, anti-radiation medication has the same contraindication as the real radiation sickness, and this is thyroid cancer. If a big part of the population ends up using it, who will be able to tell whether symptoms are from real radiation or from the medication? Let's not mention that radiation can also induce infertility, and we know what they are trying to do so hard through medical treatments. If that was not enough, here comes the main part – scientists are already for years under the radar trying to make a vaccine that will protect your from radiation in advance. And you guess – it is an mRNA vaccine, better say a genetic treatment. Luckily, in 2019. Israeli company Pluristem Therapeutics Inc has produced a successful one, which immediately sparked the interest of USA, who said it could use it on soldiers in radiated zones. It's easy to imagine that soldiers will be lab mice and after they prove the „miracle" of such vaccines, it will be approved for the rest of population, who would take it happily in advance. And finally, it would be strange if we have vaccines, disasters, and there is no Mr. Gates around. And surprise – WHO was taking a part in the ConvEx-3 exercise, and from it's announcement we can read that in the case of a nuclear disaster, it will be responsible for international coordination of medical response and for public communication. Further, WHO updated the list of anti-radiation medication this year after a long period. All of this makes me remember that during Chernobyil event, USSR government didn't reveal immediately what happened, but was driving around in trucks in the area and convincing people to take free cans with red lobsters. Later they said they did it because they were rich with natural elements good for radiation treatments, but it could be also they gave them something to help the radiation sickness to develop?
Another part where they could profit from such a narrative is that in case of a nuclear disaster people would be asked to stay at home, and probably work from home. Reading those advice I feel a slight shift from bunkers with 3-meter walls being necessary for protection, now staying at home is the main goal, and not to mention the miracle of working WIFI after a nuclear disaster, allowing you to work in your call centre or on OnlyFans during the apocalypse.
Again, if we think twice about it, if the main aim is to hurt people in a medical way, there is not much need to make a real disaster on the ground, or a big one at least. And if they want to make a real disaster on the ground and want to hurt people with radiation, medicines are not needed. Instead, they need a short-term catastrophe to remind people of reality of nuclear weapons ( especially younger generations who haven't lived through the cold war era ) and get them to take the vaccines by their own will during peacetime.
DESIRED OUTCOMES
The last is to see what long-term agendas they hope such an event serves. Here are few things to consider - first, during Chernobyl crisis people were asked to destroy the radiated crops. Further, Ukraine is one of the largest world wheat producers and exporters, so such a crisis would be a fair reason to seriously disrupt the production and export. The real cold war in its full intensity would start and the there would be economical consequences world wide. It is evident from all above that likely this is the trigger they need for this long-awaited hunger crisis to start. Besides that, it would be a final argument to ban nuclear energy, and along with kicking out the oil and gas, to make possible a new medieval age of „renewable, green, clean" energy, where you have nothing and you are happy.
It would be a beginning of a new era of nuclear fear. Countries would get a green light to start building shelters for their whole populations if possible, as Switzerland and Finland already did. Or at least wash some money in preparedness programs. Nuclear fear would be incorporated into school programs, and the medical industry will kick in at full speed. Media will use it to remove the focus from whatever is of real importance.
Finally, I would like to state for those who fear, that a ww3 is absolutely not in the plan as an outcome of this crisis. There are several reasons for this. First, an event of that dimension needs a proper preparation and a prelude, such as the Balkan wars before ww1 or the Spanish civil war and different European crisis and annexations before ww2. The opening crisis has a goal to prepare people and the political terrain, most importantly, to form clear alliances which will enter the world war, and which doesn't exist in the moment, and has existed before previous world wars. Unclear positions like those of China has to clear out until the end of this Ukraine episode. When it ends, the world will enter into a temporary de-escalation, (and other distractions) as a break and preparation time for a real world war. This is what David Icke calls „two steps forward, one step behind" technique. Second, you can see a modus operandi of a series of events of same kind, repeating with magnifying intensity. There was the Swine flu, then there was the COVID, and finally there should be a Pandemic X; there was an islamist terrorist wave in europe, which should now evolve into a low-key religious-civil war with Christians, and finally, as they hope, into annihilation of both religions in a global conflict. All mentioned here is something that a common propagandist and public relation expert would find reasonable to do.
Lastly, I didn't mention the bunkers for no reason. They need to start a massive process of preparation for WWIII in all sectors of society because they want to fake a global nuclear war itself. Building such amount of shelters, organising such logistics, redirecting whole economies, forming whole new militaries of needed „experts" will take some time, and before they do it you know the fruit is not ripe yet. Read the Georgia guide stones again – they want a clean mother earth, with far fewer people on it, but still clean and living mother earth. If they could achieve this goal just by faking a nuclear apocalypse, it would be a win-win for them. For most, it will be obvious that staging such a big theatre play is as delusional and impossible as it sounds, but it's not stopping them to believe it or to try. More on how exactly they want to do it, in the next articles.
I have no clue what these naively optimistic predators plan to do.
I'm not worried.
Con-vid was the scariest thing for me. People sucked it up as truth and went along with it.
But public trust in leadership has been dropping to an all time low.
Even though the truth about the jabs is still hazy to most people, they subconsciously know to not trust the boosters. Humanity is learning some much needed instinctual thinking, the same thing that let people like us question con-vid.
Maybe if this happened, there will be a time when real scientists (the ones who actually follow the scientific method, not the morons who pushed con-vid) will come out and expose how corrupt the system is and make a good case for strong reforms to keep corporate stooges out of governance.
I'll add my 2 cents as an ex radiation worker.
Contamination can be falsely asserted with simple radiation detectors and videos. A tried and true method I dealt with is as follows.
A - Most detectors have a calibration dial, that can be turned up or down, that makes a noise after a desired threshold value is reached
B - the threshold is set just below the background level.
C- the unit is waved over a source.
D - the unit screams wildly.
E - this is recorded on video, then distributed as "proof of serious and deadly contamination".
F - but the source is most often not much higher than background, and well within the General Public's amount of millisievert's (2/year) than they can safely be exposed to.