If the U.S. really did blow up Nord Stream, does that mean it`s officially WWIII?

Also, is Russia planning to take control of the Northwest Passage?

On February 8th, 2023, Seymour Hersh published an investigative report into the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline back in September of last year.

Init, Hersh makes very specific allegations about how elite U.S. Navy divers planted C4 explosives on the pipeline at Biden`s command.

As a Mint Press article explains:

Based on interviews with national security insiders, Hersh – the journalist who broke the stories of the My Lai Massacre, the CIA spying program and the Abu Ghraib torture scandal – claims that in June, U.S. Navy divers traveled to the Baltic Sea and attached C4 explosive charges to the pipeline. By September, President Biden himself ordered its destruction. According to Hersh, all understood the stakes and the gravity of what they were doing, acknowledging that, if caught, it would be seen as a flagrant “act of war” against their allies.

If all of this is true, it is a very big deal. An attack this significant leads me to believe that the U.S.-Russia proxy war in Ukraine is likely to lead to World War III. And it`s probably true.

Hersh, if you didn`t know, is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who has a long track record of breaking important stories. When he describes himself as ¨the world`s leading investigative journalist¨, he´s not just blowing his own horn.

He`s paid his dues, earned his stripes, and is respected by his peers. This is not Alex Jones yelling about NATO blowing up a pipeline. This is from as credible a source as you could hope for.

So, I`m just going to state the obvious. This is an act of war. If NATO really did blow up Nord Stream, that means that NATO is at war with Russia.

Now, I know I`m not alone in suspecting that the whole COVID psy op was Round One of World War III, but I think that we can pretty much stop speculating now. I think it`s undeniable. World War III isn`t around the corner. It`s already here.

Let`s keep in mind that Russia has the unequivocal support of China in challenging NATO. Shortly before Russia invaded Ukraine, Putin and Xi Jinping held a joint press conference where the two leaders announced the end of the unipolar world order.

In other words, they were saying ¨You don`t get to tell us what to do anymore.¨ It was a momentous historic occasion. The commanders of two of the world`s three most powerful militaries were officially declaring the of end of U.S. global hegemony.

Sooo… what exactly does that mean for those of us who wish to live our lives in peace, without having our lives upended by war? How can we best prepare for the future?

Well, I suppose that we should all planning to bunker down and make it through the storm. If this is World War III, our priority should be first and foremost survival. How can we become as self-sufficient as possible so as to be prepared in the event of catastrophic system failure? How can we make sure that our friends and families are protected? How can we organize politically in the context of a global war?

Although I think that many of my readers will agree with me that this really is WWIII, I think there is still considerable denial what exactly that implies, including in the alternative media.

There is, of course, a significant question as to whether or not the war in Ukraine is being stage-managed for propaganda purposes, or rather, to what degree this is occurring.

The BRICS nations have continuously pledged their loyalty to the UN and their "sustainable development" scam, Agenda 21/2030:

Commentators such as Iain Davis and Riley Waggaman have pointed out how Russia and China have repeatedly re-affirmed their commitment to the Great Reset, suggesting that the same globalist overlords control the governments of both BRICS and NATO countries. When one realizes the power that the Bank of International Settlements has over the global financial system, this hypothesis seems quite plausible.

This may well be, but it does not follow that this means that World War III will be a scripted, Made-for-TV spectacle. I don`t believe that anyone has the power to control the future to the degree that they can stage-manage a world war.

I agree with Iain Davis when he writes:

Through empire, colonialism, neocolonialism—that is, through economic, military, financial and monetary conquest, coupled with the debt obligations imposed upon targeted nations—global powers have always been able to dominate and control lesser ones.

National governments, if defined in purely political terms, have never been the only source of authority behind the efforts to construct world order. As revealed by Antony C. Sutton and others, private corporate power has aided national governments in shaping “world order.”

Neither Hitler’s rise to power nor the Bolshevik Revolution would have occurred as they did, if at all, without the guidance of the Wall Street financiers. The bankers’ global financial institutions and extensive international espionage networks were instrumental in shifting global political power.

In other words, we need to understand that the game of power is not only fought between nation-states. It is fought between factions whose interests align, and different types of factions exist. In WWIII, multi-national corporations like BlackRock and Vanguard are much more important players than most countries are. And yes, there are dynastic families, such as the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, whose inscrutable schemes are doubtlessly shaping world events to some degree as well.

But make no mistake - WWIII will not be a fake war orchestrated by hidden puppet-masters. It will be real, because it must be real in order for it to serve its purpose. There will be winners and losers. There is a real power struggle, and some factions will come out on top. Others will see their power reduced, and some may be destroyed altogether. But one cannot look at WWIII as simply a fight between NATO and BRICS. Things are much more complicated than that. There aren`t three players in this game. There are countless.

That said, I do suspect that the new cold war will not stay cold for long. I think hot war is coming soon to many parts of the world. I hope I`m wrong, but it seems probable to me that there will be a collision of raw military power at some point in the near future. I think that we should all be bracing ourselves for impact.

In all seriousness, this has a lot to do with the reason that I advocate for people to start thinking about spirituality. There are no atheists in foxholes, and I for one think that we`re in for some dark days. Honestly, I don`t think that there is a political solution to the problems facing the world right now. I believe that certain things were set into motion long ago, and that things must now come to their natural conclusion. And, yes, that`s a scary thought, especially since my home country of Canada is very much in Russia`s cross-hairs.

Why do I say that, you ask? Canada in the cross-hairs? What am I on about?

I`m serious. Hear me out. Ever heard of the Northwest Passage? How about the Polar Silk Road?

Basically, the melting of Arctic sea ice has opened up the possibility of new shipping routes through the Arctic Ocean. And both Russia and China have been preparing for years to make the most of this opportunity.

These new shipping routes are of tremendous commercial value, but they are of even greater geopolitical importance. Whoever controls the Northwest Passage will have a major military advantage.

Why, you ask? Well, because war is largely a question of logistics. If you can mobilize faster than your enemy, you`ve got a huge advantage. Remember, there are currently only two maritime routes between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans - ships can either go through the Panama canal or around the Southern tip of Souther America.

It`s worth pointing out that Panama is controlled by the U.S., and that the Americans could close it to enemy traffic in the event of a war.

So, currently both China and Russia are at a major disadvantage, militarily speaking. If Russia takes control of the Northwest Passage, however, the tables will have turned.

Russia, which has always excelled in cold-weather warfare, seems to have developed a strategy which plays to its strengths. And it seems that China and the other BRICS nations intend to back them up.

What am I referring to, you ask? Well, on the 4th of February, 2022, Presidents Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping issued an important joint statement, saying:

The sides [Russian Federation and Chinese People’s Republic] strongly support the development of international cooperation and exchanges [. . .], actively participating in the relevant global governance process, [. . .] to ensure sustainable global development. [. . .]

The international community should actively engage in global governance[.] [. . .] The sides reaffirmed their intention to strengthen foreign policy coordination, pursue true multilateralism, strengthen cooperation on multilateral platforms, defend common interests, support the international and regional balance of power, and improve global governance. [. . .]

The sides call on all States [. . .] to protect the United Nations-driven international architecture and the international law-based world order, seek genuine multipolarity with the United Nations and its Security Council playing a central and coordinating role, promote more democratic international relations, and ensure peace, stability and sustainable development across the world.

Granted, you have to read between the lines a bit here, but they`re basically telling the U.S. that they`re not going to put up with being pushed around anymore. Three weeks after this announcement, Russia invaded Ukraine, with the tacit support of China and the other BRICS nations. In retrospect, this date might be seen by historians as a declaration of war.

I`ll also mention that the Arctic airspace could also potentially become a key site of struggle in WWIII. As NATO secretary Jens Stoltenberg wrote last year:

“The shortest path to North America for Russian missiles or bombers would be over the North Pole. This makes NORAD’s role vital for North America and for NATO.”

NORAD, by the way, is North America`s air defence system, which Trudeau is apparently throwing some money at.

The Liberal government also committed to an overall investment in continental and northern defence that it says will exceed $40 billion over the next two decades.

Ottawa has yet to fully explain how the money will be spent, other than to say approximately $15 billion will go to infrastructure upgrades.

So, there you have it. Russia is preparing for Arctic warfare, and so is NATO. And China seems to have some kind of deal worked out with Russia. Can Canada stand up to Russia militarily? Of course not. I don`t even think that even the U.S. could take on Russia in the arctic. Cold-weather warfare has always been a Russian specialty. They`ve got a trump card, and they`re planning to use it.

So, where does that leave us? Well, who knows? Part of the reason that I want to put this out there to the world is in hopes that others will help me direct my research so that I might develop a better understanding of what exactly is happening. I understand the argument that both NATO and BRICS countries are controlled by globalists that want to bring in a global technocratic dictatorship, but that doesn`t mean that WWIII isn`t real.

What DOES it mean? That`s what I`m trying to figure out.

As far as I can tell, there are two major things that WWIII will be fought over. The first is control of the post-petrodollar financial system, in which a new form of money will presumably replace the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency. The second is control of Arctic shipping routes.

So, I`m going to leave it at that for now. In the days and weeks to come, I will be focusing my research on China`s Belt and Road initiative, the Arctic Silk Road, and what studying oil and gas infrastructure plans in the Far North can tell us about global geopolitics.

Please stay tuned, and as always, I encourage my readers to share relevant information with me in the comments, and to let me know if I`ve made any misakes.