I'm calling it: The Anti-Virus Side has Won the Debate

Dr. Michael Yeadon + Denis Rancourt = "Read 'em & Weep, Bitches!"

Dear Nevermorons,

Well, folks, look like the crazies were right. Experts now agree: viruses are faker than pro wrestling.

On April 17th, your friendly neighbourhood granny killers, led by All-Star King Kook Tobin Owl, posted an article entitled Is this the Last Nail in Virology’s Coffin?

In that piece, Tobin wrote:

A recent paper by Dr. Mark Bailey has dealt a definitive, deadly blow to virology’s teetering house of cards.

If you haven’t made a point of doing your own investigation into the methods of modern virology, you may think this claim sounds crude and uneducated. You may be thinking “Virology dead?! Come on now, be serious.”

But in the minds of many of us who’ve been examining the subject in detail, indeed the entire body of virology, though deceptively technical and superficially “sophisticated,” appears flimsier and flimsier the deeper we look.

He goes on to say:

A new book has just been published by lifelong naturopath Daniel Roytas, long a highly-esteemed lecturer at Australia’s leading natural medicine colleges and universities. Yet his book challenges many of the deeply engrained assumptions even of a majority of practitioners of natural medicine—ideas about germs and contagion that people of all walks take for granted, including, formerly, Dr. Roytas himself. The book, titled Can You Catch a Cold?, reviews the forgotten history of the failures of germ theory to produce authentic validation, even when not just a few experiments were intentionally designed to try to study and prove contagiousness. At 450 pages long with over 1000 footnotes, the book brings a formidable and unprecedented review of the scientific and medical literature concerning the question of whether illnesses like the cold and influenza are indeed contagious.

Dan Roytas: Can You Catch A Cold?

Then, on April 25th, this came across my feed:

“Holy Jumpin’ Jehoshaphat,” I thought to myself, “Is this for real?” Dr. Michael Yeadon AND Denis Rancourt are anti-virus now?

I then read the article, which is not to be missed.

Dr. Yeadon: I’m Formally Confident That Acute Respiratory Illnesses That We Call Colds and Flu Are Not Caused by Submicroscopic Infectious Particles Called Viruses & Are Not Contagious

The TL;DR is basically that Dr. Mike Yeadon is now calling virology “wholly fraudulent”.

I’m formally confident that acute respiratory illnesses that we call colds and flu (“influenza-like illnesses) are not caused by submicroscopic infectious particles called viruses & are not contagious.

For a number of other diseases which are attributed to viruses, such as “HIV/AIDS” & “Polio”, I’ve followed the trail of evidence far enough to also state that there is no evidence that they’re caused by such viruses.

The statement couldn’t really be more unequivocal. And this is coming from Dr. Michael Yeadon, who emerged from the COVID era as clearly one of the most principled and credible scientists IN THE ENTIRE WORLD.

We here at Nevermore Media are big fans of Dr. Yeadon, but I’ve already sung his praises elsewhere, so I’ll refrain from repeating myself.

If for some reason you’re unaware of Dr. Yeadon’s impeccable credentials, you can check out this piece:

And if you don’t know who Denis Rancourt is, he’s the guy that proved COVID was fake. For that reason alone, I consider him the world’s greatest living scientist.

He’s also from Ottawa, my hometown. I sing his praises here:

DR. MICHAEL YEADON + DENIS RANCOURT = “READ ‘EM & WEEP, BITCHES!”

Because I am of the firm belief that everyone is entitled to my opinion, I sprung into action, posting a Note:

Denis Rancourt then proceed to like my Note, which presumably means that he agrees with my characterization of his position.

So, there you have it, folks. Dr. Mike Yeadon and Denis Rancourt are anti-virus now. Who do the pro-virus crowd have on their side? Robert Malone? Peter Hotez? Neil deGrasse Tyson? Paul Offit?

IT’S OFFICIAL, FOLKS. VIRUSES DON’T EXIST!

I’m calling it: the debate is over, and the anti-virus side has won.

Now we can move on to a much more important question: how should illnesses be treated?

If the smartest people in the world now agree that the old paradigm was flawed, that means we need a new paradigm.

In other words, we’ve entered into a new phase of the paradigm shift. Now the question isn’t about the old paradigm… but what the new one will be.

First things first, though. Let’s celebrate the triumph of intelligence against the forces of stupidity.

April 25th was a great day for humanity, and we all owe Dr. Yeadon and Denis Rancourt a debt of gratitude.

Now that we have the virus question dealt with, we can finally move on to more important questions, like “Fucking magnets, how do they work?”