Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nowick Gray's avatar

I thought about commenting to add some nuance to the label "brutalist" tagged on Stone Age Herbalist... except I did place him in that corner of the ring framing the debate in my article. As if to demonstrate his greater breadth of interest and scholarship, this morning's substack from SAH dives deep into the esoteric realms of Buddhist history and philosophy: https://www.stoneageherbalist.com/p/interview-buddhism-tibet-and-vajrayana

@stoneageherbalist @thecrowisamessenger @paulcudenec

Expand full comment
NEVERMORE MEDIA's avatar

Margaret Mead: "Among the Plains Indians, the individual who preferred the placid activities of the women to the dangerous, nerve-racking activities of the men could phrase his preference in sex terms; he could assume women’s dress and occupations and proclaim that he really was more a woman than a man. In Mundugumor, where there is no such pattern, a man may engage in feminine activities, such as fishing, without it occurring to him to symbolize his behavior in female attire.

Without any contrast between the sexes and without any tradition of transvestism, a variation in temperamental preference does not result in either homosexuality or transvestism. As it is unevenly distributed over the world, it seems clear that transvestism is not only a variation that occurs when there are different personalities decreed for men and women, but that it need not occur even there. It is, in fact, a social invention that has become stabilized among the American Indians and in Siberia, but not in Oceania.

I observed in some detail the behavior of an American Indian youth who was in all probability a congenital invert, during the period when he was just making his transvestism explicit. This man had, as a small boy, shown such marked feminine physical traits that a group of women had once captured him and undressed him to discover whether he was really a boy at all. As he grew older he began to specialize in women’s occupations and to wear female underclothing, although he still affected the outer costume of a male. He carried in his pockets, however, a variety of rings and bangles such as were worn only by women. At dances in which the sexes danced separately, he would begin the evening dressed as a man and dancing with the men, and then, as if acting under some irresistible compulsion, he would begin to move closer and closer to the women, as he did so putting on one piece of jewelry after another. Finally, a shawl would appear, and at the end of the evening, he would be dressed as a berdache, a transvestite. The people were just beginning to speak of him as “she.” I have cited his case in this connection to make clear that this is the type of maladjusted individual with which this discussion is not concerned. His aberrancy appeared to have a specific physiologic origin; it was not a mere temperamental variation that his society had decided to define as feminine.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts