Why are Leftist "anarchists" defending globalist bankers?

Paul Cudenec fires back at the Kool Aid Kids

The article you are about to read was written by Paul Cudenec, the world’s foremost defender of real anarchism.

Paul is the second of my comrades to come to my defence after a pathetic attempt by the thought police to cancel Nevermore for heresy and thoughtcrime.

For those of you who didn’t know, Nevermore was recently targeted in a hackneyed attempt at a smear campaign.

No, I’m not talking about the CBC, who tried to make me look like some kind of anarchist super-villain in their hilarious piece When Anarchists Attack.

WHY ARE MY FORMER COMRADES TALKING SHIT ABOUT ME?

I’m talking about my former publishers Montreal Counter-Info, who published a hatchet job that would make Greg Renouf proud.

Why would a supposedly anarchist website publish a hit piece targeting Nevermore, you ask?

Good question. I have two theories:

1. The anonymous hatchet artists were cops, spooks, propagandists, or another kind of professional deceivers, and the people who run Montreal Counter-Info (who used to have a very good reputation) are unwittingly sharing the work of agents of ideological subversion.

2. The Montreal anglo pro-com scene was jealous about the attention that I was getting because the CBC was making me out to be a ringleader years after I was run out of Montreal for being too much of a “bro-dude”. Worried that impressionable, improperly indoctrinated people might think that Nevermore is cool, they decided to take preventative action by tarring me with the brush of anti-semitism, transphobia, feminism, as well as making a big deal about the fact that I happen to be a diagnosed schizophrenic.

I consider the former theory far likelier than the latter, and will operate under the assumption that it is true unless given reason to reconsider.

I have one simple question for the publishers of Montreal Counter-Info:

1. Do you know who wrote the hit piece?

   I’m not asking you to reveal their identities. They have a right to their privacy. I’m simply asking if you can confidently assert that they are not spooks. I think this is a fair question, don’t you? Or do you think that COINTELPRO tactics are just another crazy conspiracy theory?

Speaking of conspiracy theories, I have to laugh when you call my comrades and I “conspiracists” whilst simultaneously promoting the laughable notion of “red-brown alliances” between communists and fascists, the conspiracy theory promoted by Alexander Reid Ross, the top cop of the thought police during the Anarchist Inquisition.

Now that we know that ARR was an intelligence agent, we know that a massive campaign of ideological subversion has been ongoing for years. Or did you not get that memo?

Incidentally, that campaign also involves other COINTELPRO-style tactics, such as weaponized rape accusations. If you have a hard time believing this, I suggest looking into the smears targeting Rod Coronado and Skylar Williams.

If you seriously believe that the smear campaign against Skylar Williams was warranted, all I can do is shake my head. You guys are fucking idiots. There’s no other reasonable conclusion.

Alexander Reid Ross didn’t act alone, by the way. He was part of a team that involved many people. His most obvious accomplices were Shane Burley and Spencer Sunshine, who continue to peddle their poison whilst you fuckwits comb through the comment sections on my blog looking for things you can take out of context to make me look bad.

Ross has been outed as a spook, and is laying low, but Burley and Sunshine get a pass for some reason. Why?

Ross, Burley, and Sunshine are all Jewish, by the way, as is Tzeporah Berman, the sleaziest snake of them all. Oh, pardon me. I misspoke. I should have said is that all they all “happen to be Jewish”. Forgive my impropriety.

To those who want to portray me as a racist, yeah, you’re gonna have a hard time with that. I’d like to remind y’all that I was pretty much the only one sticking up for the right of Jews in Montreal to hold religious services during the dark days of COVID.

Back in 2020, I wrote a piece called In Defence of Religious Freedom, which was published by Montreal Counter-Info. In it, I wrote:

Multiple gatherings of orthodox Jews have been broken up by police in Montreal over the last month. Not only is a clear example of oppression against a historically oppressed group, it is always telling about the times that we are living in. I don’t think that most people realize what this means. It means that we don’t have rights anymore.

I was the only anarchist in Canada, so far as I am aware, to stand up for Orthodox Jews when they were being persecuted by the state. And I’d do it again.

Agents of ideological subversion want you to think that “conspiracists” all think that all Jewish people are part of one big conspiracy, and that all criticism of Zionist criminals is racist.

But c’mon. You numbskulls don’t actually believe that, do you?

WHY ARE SO MANY AGENTS OF IDEOLOGICAL SUBVERSION JEWISH?

We’re going to have a real hard time combatting ideological subversion if we don’t notice the pattern that a heck of a lot of the people propagating it are Jewish.

Even Noam Chomsky turns out to have had connections to Epstein. This is going to be way too hard of a pill for you guys to swallow, but it appears that the guy who wrote Manufacturing Consent was engaged in ideological subversion. That’s how deep this shit goes. Wrap your mind around that one.

He also seems to have been more open-minded than most people are about sexual relationships between adults and children, as evidenced by the fact that he met not only with Epstein on multiple occasions, but also joined the convicted sex trafficker for a dinner date with Woody Allen and Soon-Yi Previn.

I wonder what they talked about.

If you didn’t know, Soon-Yi Previn is not only Woody Allen’s wife, but also his adopted daughter.

My girlfriend is 14 years younger than me, and the age difference between Woody Allen and his daughter/wife is more than twice that. Gross.

As Whitney Webb explains:

According to the Journal, Chomsky’s meetings with Epstein took place during the years 2015 and 2016, while Chomsky taught at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT. Chomsky told the Journal that he met with Epstein to discuss topics like neuroscience with other academics, like Harvard’s Martin Nowak (who was heavily funded by Epstein). On a separate occasion, Chomsky again met with Epstein alongside former Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Barak, allegedly to discuss “Israel’s policies with regard to Palestinian issues and the international arena.” A separate date saw Chomsky and his wife invited by Epstein to have dinner with him, Woody Allen and Allen’s wife Soon-Yi Previn. When asked about the dinner date with Woody Allen and Epstein, Chomsky referred to the occasion as “an evening spent with a great artist.”

When confronted with this evidence, Chomsky initially told the Journal that his meetings and relationship with Epstein were “none of your business. Or anyone’s.” He then added that “I knew him [Epstein] and we met occasionally.”

Huh. I didn’t know that Chomsky was into art.

Did you?

YOU GUYS ARE MISSING OUT ON A GREAT REASON WHY ORANGE MAN BAD

It’s too bad, really. You guys loved hating Trump, right? You know that he was deeply involved with Epstein, right? You know that one of his mentors was Roy Cohn, who ran sexual blackmail operations involving minors for decades, right?

Oh, you didn’t know that? Lame. You’re missing out on a really good reason why Orange Man Bad. I thought that moral outrage was your drug of choice, no? Are you guys dopamine fasting or something?

As Paul Cudenec writes:

It seems very strange indeed to me that “anarchists” would use fabricated political smears to cancel criticism of rich and powerful movers and shakers in the medico-pharmaceutic complex and in the global banking system.

I mean, we’re supposed to be against the domination of an ultra-rich ruling class, aren’t we?

THE TABOO AGAINST CRITICIZING RULING CLASS CRIMINALS WHO “HAPPEN TO BE JEWISH” HAS FALLEN

I know that you guys have your heads too far up your asses to understand this, but the taboo against criticizing despicable scumbags who just “happen to be Jewish” has fallen.

Why? The Epstein shit was just too much. I know that you guys were too busy being outraged at the Q-Anon psy-op to spare much outrage on Epstein, but the fact that many of the world’s most powerful people are involved in sex trafficking, and many of the people involved just so happen to be Jewish.

There hasn’t been enough outrage from the Jewish community about this, if you ask me. Maybe they're just worried that shining a light on these crimes could lead to increased anti-semitism, but it’s kinda weird that they seem more interested in suppressing criticism of these criminals than in putting an end to their crimes, isn’t it?

Or maybe they’re terrified about what the consequences could be if the truth comes out about the likes of Leslie Wexner, Lew Wasserman, Lewis Rosenstiel, and the Bronfmans.

Whitney Webb has said people that she respects in the alternative media asked her not to write her magnus opus One Nation Under Blackmail.

Let’s be honest - it’s not hard to guess why. Exposing the crimes of these criminals might feasibly lead to a rise in anti-Semitism.

I’m guessing that that’s why Glenn Greenwald opted to keep the vast majority of the Snowden leak to himself.

If you think Epstein was uniquely bad, by the way, it’s probably because you don’t know much about Henry Kissinger.

I fully acknowledge that there could be dire consequences for the Jewish people if the truth comes out, but guess what?

The truth will come out, and all I have to say is this:

IF NOT NOW, THEN WHEN?

The alternative is getting them get away with their crimes, and keep pimping out minors, running Ponzi schemes, looting pension funds, blackmailing politicians, marketing mental illness to sell drugs, profiting from wars, and using ideological subversion to keep us fighting amongst ourselves.

Lest people take this the wrong way - it’s by no means just Jews that are the problem.

Anthony Fauci isn’t Jewish, nor are Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch, Donald Trump, or the Clintons. William Casey wasn’t Jewish, nor were the Bushes, nor are Trudeau or Mark Carney.

And that’s to say nothing of the old-money dynasties of Europe, some of whom date back to the days of the Roman Empire.

Nor is it that just Europeans. You really don’t think that the Saudi Royal Family aren’t involved in sex trafficking, do you? C’mon. The word “harem” is arabic.

They’ve probably got sex slaves that have been bred in captivity for generations.

IT’S ABOUT CLASS, NOT RACE

This isn’t about race, it’s about class, and that’s why the Powers that Shouldn’t Be used a campaign of ideological subversion to convince people that it’s racist to talk about the fact that capitalism is a pyramid scheme set up to benefit a tiny number of people at the top.

The elites are all part of one big club, and you’re not in it.

Some of them are Jewish and some of them aren’t. But the Jewish ones use lawyers to silence people who speak out about their criminal activity. I, for one, find this extremely fucking irksome.

How about you?

A QUESTION FOR THE JEWISH COMMUNITY

If you’re Jewish, and you feel attacked by me when I call out people like Epstein, Woody Allen, and Chomsky, I think that says more about me than it does about me.

I’m sticking my neck out by saying these things, because I’ve had enough of this bullshit. If we let these psychopaths go unchallenged, the world is going to keep getting worse and worse until it becomes a hellish nightmare land.

If anyone wants to propose a revolutionary strategy that doesn’t involve pissing off the Anti-Defamation League, I’m all ears. It kinda seems to me like we have no other option than to confront ruling class criminals, some of whom happen to be Jewish, and that the Jewish ones are going to frame opposition to them as anti-Semitic. The only feasible option I see is to stop giving a fuck what they think, but maybe I’m just not imaginative enough. I’m genuinely interested in any proposals people might have.

As I’ve said before, the secret to success is to have no fear. Most people are afraid to speak out about this subject because they’re afraid of getting in trouble.

My question to the Jewish community is this: If everyone’s afraid of you, are you really that oppressed?

The Money behind the Smears

by Paul Cudenec

by Paul Cudenec

Back in 2020 I was on the receiving end of a lot of vitriol from so-called “anarchists” who objected to the fact that I refused to abandon my commitment to truth and freedom in the face of the Covid coup.

That all went quiet after a while and, moving on, I stopped even caring what these confused people thought about me.

So it was a bit of a surprise to find, via my comrades at Nevermore Media, that I had been targeted by a few unpleasant paragraphs on the Montreal Counter Information website, as you can see here.

The main target of the attack was one of their own former associates, the Canadian activist known as Crow Qu’appelle, and one of the ways they tried to blacken his name was through his ideological association with me, so my name therefore had to be tainted with the odour of badness.

In predictable fashion, they condemned my exposures of the agenda behind the Great Reset, including the collaborative role of anarchists and the Left, as “full-throttle conspiracy mongering”.

Moreover, because I have dared to criticise the Rothschilds and challenge the transhumanist/transgender industry, I am apparently guilty of “propagating far-right conspiracy theories about Jewish bankers and trans people”!

When even the likes of George Galloway, Scots left-winger (and jab enthusiast), can be labelled “far-right” for challenging one aspect of the global mafia’s domination, the term has clearly been redefined to the point that it has no actual meaning.

But I do still find it irritating to be seriously misrepresented by an anonymous hack (possibly a spook, as Crow writes) who clearly has no interest in understanding where I am coming from but has merely set out to attack me.

So why the attention now, three years after I was first excommunicated by the High Priests of the Central Global Church of Woke Pseudo-Anarchism?

I think a clue lies in the reference to other like-minded thinkers with whom I have been collaborating both in the English-speaking world, partly via Nevermore, and also in France and Italy.

The article warns of “a transnational echo chamber of conspiracists who have been embracing increasingly reactionary, transphobic, and antisemitic ideas”.

In other words, they are worried that we are coming together and regrouping outside of the controlled woke-left mind-prison to begin to form a coherent long-term international resistance movement!

A similar angle was adopted by an article in the UK’s Freedom News which is referenced by the Montreal hatchet job.

This attack on feminist Jennifer Bilek claims she is a “source of growing anti-semitic conspiracy theories in the gender-critical movement”.

Again, the “antisemitism” here is an invention. It just so happens that many leading players in the transhumanist/transgender industry, as identified by Jennifer’s excellent research, have Jewish backgrounds.

She is obviously not saying that all transhumanists are Jewish, nor, of course, that all or many Jews are transhumanists.

Criticising transhumanism cannot logically be regarded as automatically “antisemitic”, whatever the ethno-cultural identity of those involved!

The spectre of “antisemitism” is merely being used here to close down any analysis of, and challenge to, the multi-billion dollar industry in question.

It seems very strange indeed to me that “anarchists” would use fabricated political smears to cancel criticism of rich and powerful movers and shakers in the medico-pharmaceutic complex and in the global banking system.

I mean, we’re supposed to be against the domination of an ultra-rich ruling class, aren’t we?

Perhaps some might imagine that this is merely a side-effect of the woke ideology, that their fixation with the threat from anything regarded as “far-right” blinds them to the bigger politico-economic picture.

But there is another line in the Freedom News article which is even more alarming.

Pointing to Jennifer’s previous involvement in Deep Green Resistance, it depicts that organisation not only, predictably, as “transphobic” but also as an “eco-terrorism promoting organisation”.

How could anyone identifying as an anarchist glibly roll out a phrase that sounds like it has been issued from the corridors of authoritarian power?

Real environmentalists are “terrorists”? Writing about real environmentalism is “promoting” terrorism? There is something deeply fishy about the Freedom News angle here.

I have previously written about the dubious connections enjoyed by many so-called “radicals”.

In November 2020 I exposed the ultra-rich “impact” capitalists of the WEF-linked Guerrilla Foundation who fund “activists” in the hope of profiting from “systemic change”, even paying them to hobnob with what should be their enemies at “Unlikely Allies” Impact Hubs.

In February 2021 I investigated Edge Fund, (aren’t they clever, with their pun?), a dodgy organisation which has been seeking to fund anarchists since 2013.

Deeply embedded in the global “philanthropy” network, Edge Fund enjoys links to Big Society Capital, set up by “impact capitalist” Sir Ronald Cohen.

In April 2021 I showed how woke “intersectionality” is, like the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, closely aligned with the impact industry.

And in January 2023 I looked into the four so-called “environmentalists” who had been smearing my French and Italian comrades and discovered that each one of them worked for the Macron regime and/or European foundations promoting vaccines and smart cities.

With regard to the strange “eco-terrorism” line in the Freedom News report, it turns out that they in fact lifted the phrase directly from a March 2021 article by the Trans Safety Network.

The network is a member of Consortium, which describes itself as “the national infrastructure and umbrella body for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans+ groups across the UK”.

My personal alarm bells were immediately set ringing by the fact that Consortium’s website includes an “Outcomes & Impact” section in which “we aim to help LGBT+ groups identify the changes their work is making and how to demonstrate this”.

Measuring “outcomes” is a key element of the digital slavery system known as impact investment and is one of the reasons why the global power nexus is trying to force us to lead our lives online, in an all-inclusive “metaverse” in which our digital twins are commodified for exploitation and speculation.

To this end, Consortium boasts of its Outcomes Framework which “sets out a standardised structure of five core areas of impact and associated sub-outcomes, as well as three underlying principles”.

Stressing the importance of “monitoring, evaluation and learning”, it complains of “an evidence gap around the achievements of the LGBT+ sector in the UK”.

Consortium explains that the impact outcome framework was produced with the help of Traverse, which it describes as “an independent social research and evaluation consultancy”.

It is with Traverse that we can see the real agenda behind Consortium’s outcomes obsession, the related activities of its members such as Trans Safety Network and the anti-radical smears parroted by the useful idiots in the not-so-alternative woke media.

One of the businesses with which Traverse proudly announces that it works is Arcadis NV, a Dutch “global design, engineering and management consulting company” involved in the construction of London City Airport, the A2 motorway in the Netherlands, the Millau motorway viaduct in France, the Tietê River Project in Brazil, and the Long Beach International Gateway, in California, USA.

Others are CITB (Construction Industry Training Board) – “It’s our job to help the construction industry attract talent and to support skills development, to build a better Britain” – and Horizon Nuclear Power.

Now why would any of the above want to smear real environmentalists (as opposed to tame corporate puppets) as “eco-terrorists”, I wonder?

Worse is to come. Two further businesses with which Traverse works are Wellcome Trust, the rotten heart of Big Pharma in the UK, and Big Society Capital, the entity with which Ronald Cohen launched his impact capitalism racket.

What was that again, about Traverse being “independent”?

This is all damning enough, but the trail doesn’t even end here: Traverse, it turns out, is itself “a member of Sonder, a group of organisations”.

The Traverse site tells us: “The Sonder Group and its individual members have been appointed to a series of governenment [sic] frameworks which allow Direct award of contracts in the Health Sector and other Public Sector fields”.

Ah, right! So it’s part of the ongoing privatisation of the public sector, including the NHS, by big business parasites – a process of which impact investment is very much a part.

Sonder, on its own site, says its aims are to “create change” and “achieve sustainable impact”.

It seems very close to a business called PPL, with two PPL co-founders and managing partners, Simon Morioka and Claire Kennedy, on the Sonder board.

PPL actually stands for Private Public Ltd, a name which evokes the business-state merger pioneered by Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler in the early 20th century.

Unsurprisingly, it is heavily into the impact capitalism scam.

Its Impact Report for 2020-21 brags how it had been “supporting the London Covid-19 vaccination effort” and announces that “we are working to launch a new charitable foundation which will help to ensure that the social impact funding we generate forms part of a long-term investment in local people and communities”.

And the following year’s impact report (2021-2022) declares that it aims to “maximise the impact of our growing social impact fund” and “spread our impact more widely than we have done previously”.

So we have seen that Trans Safety Network is part of Consortium, whose framework was provided by Traverse, which is a member of Sonder, which is run by business people from the likes of Private Public Ltd.

More light is shed on the nature of Trans Safety Network (originators of Freedom News’ “eco-terrorism” smear) by the fact that a glowing profile of its director Shash Appan features on the ILGA Europe website.

This organisation, the European region of the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association, describes itself as “an independent, international non-governmental umbrella organisation uniting over 700 organisations from 54 countries across Europe and Central Asia”.

ILGA Europe enjoys consultative status at the United Nations Economic and Social Council and participatory status at the Council of Europe and can boast of some heavyweight financial backing, not least from the European Union and the Government of the Netherlands.

Another of its funders is the Oak Foundation, set up by British billionaire businessman Alan Parker who made a “fortune” in “hedge funds and high tech” and is now happily installed, with his money, in Geneva, Switzerland.

Oak Foundation, itself Swiss-based, says it “comprises a group of philanthropic organisations based in various countries around the world”.

It seeks to “achieve high impact” and explains: “We define the impact of our investments in consultation with partners and support their capacity to assess and measure progress”.

This ties in nicely with the LGBT+ impact outcomes framework produced by Traverse for Consortium and thus, by extension, for its member Trans Safety Network.

A further funder of ILGA Europe is the EVZ Foundation (Remembrance Responsibility Future) which says its mission is “to keep the memory of National Socialist persecution alive”.

It explains that it “raises awareness of the intellectual and cultural heritage of German-language Judaism in schools and universities. Particular attention is drawn to the Jewish contribution to Europe’s political, economic and cultural development”.

It talks of its “substantive impact goals” and its involvement with the controversial IHRA definition of “antisemitism”.

For unspecified reasons, EVZ is also keen on “Support for Ukraine“.

It is likewise unclear why EVZ funds LGBT+ campaigning. I have the uncomfortable feeling that there may be some convoluted connection here with the “growing anti-semiticconspiracy theories in the gender-critical movement” of which Freedom News has been warning.

Indeed, this intuition is confirmed by the identity of the final listed funder of ILGA Europe, Wellspring Philanthropic Fund, formerly known as the Matan B’Seter Foundation.

Jewish media source The Algemeiner explainsthat it is part of a web of trusts and foundations set up by “a trio of philanthropists, who took great pains to conceal their giving” and provided “extensive support for Jewish charities”.

Its article explains that “for more than two decades, the partners at little known hedge fund TGS Management – Andrew Shechtel, David Gelbaum and C. Frederick Taylor – have coordinated their donations through lawyers who have helped them cover their tracks”.

As well as the $13 billion distributed through this secretive network, “an additional $1 billion was donated through public foundations such as the Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, which distributes funds for thousands of donors, making the ultimate destination of their contributions impossible to determine”.

And yes, before you ask, this is indeed part of the same Vanguard empire that seems to ownpretty much every major business in the world, along with sister companies like BlackRock and State Street.

Predictably, Vanguard Charitable says it is dedicated to “charitable impact through strategic and thoughtful philanthropy”.

The lesson from all of this is that people, particularly those on the “left”, urgently need to wise up.

They have to understand that the smears against us dissidents are false flag operations.

They appear on “anarchist”, “environmentalist” or other “left” websites and are couched in the appropriate language, passing themselves off as condemnations of the “far-right”, “antisemitism” or “fascist drifts”.

But the source of the propaganda is identical to that of the funding channelled furtively down to these public-facing groups and individuals.

Both money and smears issue from a secretive global network of “philanthropy”, “charity”, “impact”, “umbrella groups”, “consultancies”, “foundations” and “funds” closely tied to national and international institutions.

The likes of Montreal Counter Information and Freedom News like to pretend they are punching “up”, against a threat emanating from some kind of international “far-right” conspiracy, whereas in fact they are punching “down”, against free-thinking rebels, on behalf of the ruthless global criminocracy.

[Audio version]