Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Monica Sharpe's avatar

After reading your previous blog and now this one, I became so wrapped up in this story that I had to order the book. 👏👏👏

Wayne Leng's avatar

# Important Information Does Not Automatically Make Someone a Hero

A recent article about Vancouver’s missing women describes Bill Hiscox as a “Canadian hero” because of information he provided about Robert Pickton in 1998. I understand why someone relying only on published accounts might reach that conclusion. But I knew Bill, and the public version leaves out important parts of the story.

After my friend Sarah de Vries disappeared in April 1998, I created and distributed numerous posters seeking information. I redesigned those posters several times. One version included my telephone number, and that is how Bill contacted me.

I had a recording device connected to my telephone and recorded our conversation. Bill talked about Pickton’s previous attempted-murder charge, his visits to Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside and information concerning women’s clothing, purses and identification reportedly seen in Pickton’s trailer. I preserved that conversation and turned the recording over to Vancouver police detective Lori Shenher, who was investigating the missing women.

Bill’s information was significant. That should be acknowledged. But acknowledging one significant act is not the same as declaring the person a hero.

Much of what Bill told me had originated with a woman I will call Lisa. She knew Bill well and had been acquainted with Pickton for years. After the recording became public knowledge and Bill began receiving considerable media attention, Lisa contacted me. Her message was blunt: I did not really know Bill, he frightened her, and she considered him dangerous.

I spoke with Lisa by telephone on September 9 and 10, 2003. As she talked, I recorded what she told me in my journal. Those handwritten pages still exist.

Lisa alleged that when Bill was a juvenile, he and two other young people participated in the sexual assault and murder of a young woman from Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. She said they were convicted but that the records were protected because they had been juveniles. She also described Bill as violent and told me about threats and violence involving women.

I want to be completely honest about the evidentiary limits of this allegation. My journal proves that I recorded Lisa’s account in September 2003; it does not, by itself, prove that the alleged juvenile murder occurred exactly as she described it. Lisa also referred to it in an email, and substantially similar information was later relayed to me by another person who attributed it to a senior RCMP investigator. Nevertheless, I have not located an accessible court or police record that independently proves the juvenile case. I therefore present it as an allegation Lisa made to me—not as a publicly verified fact.

Her broader warning that Bill had a history of violence is supported by publicly reported court proceedings.

In 1993, William Douglas Hiscox travelled to Victoria carrying a sawed-off shotgun while repeatedly saying that he intended to kill his former wife. He received four months in jail for possessing the weapon for a dangerous purpose, followed by two years’ probation.

A subsequent custody case documented violence toward his wife and members of her family. Another case arose after he spoke about slashing a former girlfriend’s throat or forcing her vehicle off the road. He was initially convicted of uttering a threat, although the British Columbia Court of Appeal later overturned that conviction and ordered a new trial because the trial judge had applied the wrong legal test for criminal intent. I have not located the result of any retrial, so I do not describe that case as a final conviction.

I eventually came to know Bill beyond our original 1998 telephone conversation. I met him in person, had dinner with him and spoke with him numerous times by telephone and through an online chat program. What stood out to me was his interest in the publicity. He repeatedly asked whether I had seen him on television or read articles featuring him. When the attention diminished, he complained about other people receiving coverage.

A 2010 newspaper story portrayed Bill as being haunted by the women’s deaths. Based on my own dealings with him, I do not accept that portrayal. That is my personal assessment, not something I can prove about what he privately felt. What I observed was someone who repeatedly focused on his media appearances and the recognition he believed he deserved.

Bill was not part of the long struggle to find the missing women in the way that the families, friends and advocates were. His principal contribution was providing information in 1998 and subsequently dealing with investigators and reporters about that information. The original information mattered enormously, but his sustained involvement was limited.

My involvement was different. Sarah was my friend. I created and distributed the posters, operated a telephone line, recorded incoming information and gave the Hiscox recording to police. I then spent more than twenty years working on the missing-women tragedy and trying to preserve the women’s stories.

I am not trying to erase the value of Bill’s 1998 information. I am trying to prevent one consequential act from being transformed into a false and sanitized portrait of the entire man.

The honest account is more complicated: Bill supplied information that should have helped police act sooner. Much of that information originated with Lisa. My posters brought him into contact with me, and my recording preserved his account. But Bill also had a documented history of violence, and Lisa gave me a grave warning about him that public portrayals have ignored.

Calling him a “hero” without investigating that history does a disservice to the truth—and to the women whose lives and deaths should remain at the centre of this story.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?