What we do know is that JT is a "dickhead" who coerced Canadians to take an experimental mRNA genetic therapy toxin causing untold death, misery, and suffering.
Those who dared to protest in pursuit of bodily autonomy were dismissed as kooks, fascists, or white supremacists. Many protestors ultimately had their personal bank accounts frozen.
COVID revealed that JT is an authoritarian A-hole who the national security state and multinational corporations lead by the nose.
So it wouldn't be surprising, if JT's depraved activities provides a way for intelligence agencies to extort control over his political decisions.
I'm fairly good at French, having lived here in la France profonde for nearly 15 years now, and I reckon that's a mistranslation of her social media comment - I don't think it says '17 years ago', it was 'our first date *at* 17.' If it was 'ago' wouldn't it be 'il y a 17 ans'? As you, I am however willing to stand corrected. But the girl in the pic certainly looks around 17 to me.
Very good of you to fess up, btw. Having said that, it seems your clickbait really worked, considering the number of views. And 28 new subs! I've only got 38 subs right now, so 28 from one post sounds like hitting a little jack in the pot.
Maybe I'll have to think about a scandalous clickbait post of my own. Hmm... Ah! no! I'll get ChatGPT to write me one! Hah!
I read the one about Brand. I was thinking I might give him a cameo in my Katrina story, when she starts making movies. She's got an alternative Eurovision comedy musical lined up. That Lawrence Fox bloke too. All for a bit of controversy.
I've read Brand's first autobiography 'My Booky-Wook' where he talks about his addictions, to drugs and sex (you can see where they got the material from), and the book does start with him in a rehab clinic for his sex addiction. He colourfully talks about how he's not even allowed to have a wank, and he's in the clinic with a few other reprobates including, interestingly, a paedo. The fact that he talks about the paedo as a kind of 'other' - i.e. not like himself - is revealing.
I have no doubt whatsoever that Brand is not a paedo. Hebephile almost certainly, but then again I think you made the point that this applies to pretty much every hetero male on the planet. This is just biology, the fact that people become sexual around the ages of say 13 onwards. For most people at that time they fancy each other and they're all, what, 13, 14, 15. Except we don't accuse them of being hebephiles. Sure, most people's sexual preferences age as they do, but there is a limit which I would say is when you hit your prime, say ages 18-24 or so. In other words, the vast majority of men fancy women aged 18-24. But that can include women aged 16-17, and even some 15 year olds who simply matured a little faster.
Maybe that includes Trudeau - seeing as the girl in the photo as you say could be anywhere between 14-19 or so. She has a very young looking face (a lot of French girls in their prime are like that actually).
So I can well imagine Brand, especially intoxicated, would end up in bed with a 16 year old, but reading his book he's absolutely not the kind of guy to force himself on anyone - as you say, he never needed to because he had chicks lining up to sleep with him.
As for him being controlled opposition - an alternative take on that would be he was given the proverbial offer you can't refuse, combined with a threat, but he did refuse to be blackmailed. So, they went ahead and spread scurrilous shit all over the MSM. I think that's a valid theory.
Also, when we think of CO, we mustn't assume that everyone in the alt media has done all the research on every topic, and so they will have blind spots in their views, simply by not having done the research (yet) - so it seems like they are peddling the official line when the truth is they simply haven't examined that topic yet. Likewise, all of us will start off with an instinctive hypothesis/conclusion but then maybe change it in due course.
It's the people who stick to the same line, or one that serves the Establishment, despite having been presented with the evidence, who should be treated with suspicion.
Anyhow - I certainly approve of you doing a few clickbait type gossip if each one gets you 28 new subs who may then also read the brilliant and thought-provoking stuff you usually do. Means to an end type thing, you know...
Some very interesting points about the CO Accusation Game, Brand, and sexual proclivities. Out of curiosity though, wouldn't that make Brand (and it would seem many hetero men) an ephebophile as opposed to a hebephile? I suppose the "-phile" designation entails an active preference though, not just the odd attraction to a particularly (perhaps even deceptively) mature-looking individual of a younger age, so they may not actually fall into that category.
I had to look up "hebephile" haha and that's when I stumbled on to "ephebephile" and realized that apparently there is a technical difference there. Basically I just looked at Wikipedia, and they have the prior at 11-14 and the latter at 15-18, which seems more in line with the discussion.
Yeah I honestly was just going to forget it as being way too pedantic and "akshully!" to worth mentioning, but since the posts were directly grappling with the semantics at play here I figured it was worth a quick mention.
No worries! As I said in reply to Nevermore above, it is not something I had really know about either but your thoughtful resposne got me looking into it as well, and that's when I stumbled upon the different terminology. Cheers!
Good job - the original story, the follow-up acknowledgment of an error, and stay on it…there’s a reason he slimed away so quickly from Point Grey…it will come out.
Thanks! I'm pretty big on semantics to be honest. I like winning debates, and usually the people with a better grasp of definitions of key terms will win any given debate.
Some terms seem designed to muddy thinking, like "antisemitism". Pedophilia comes from the greek words for "child" and "love", meaning that if the word were used correctly, a pedophile would refer to someone who loves children.
Of course, many words are used in etymologically incorrect ways and you can't get around certain words. But certain words do stuck get stuck in my craw because they make communication more difficult. If we're talking about sex offenders who abuse children, let's not act they're motivated by love. "Pedosadists" would be a more accurate term.
I totally agree about using the right term for child abusers - abusers do not, in any way, 'love' their victims. Paedosadists is absolutely the correct word.
One definite distinction is in the psychology - paedophiles, in my view, have a kind of 'disorder of sexual development', in other words it's an obvious mental illness and there are indeed paedophiles who seek help for it, because they have the right degree of self-awareness and, ironically, because they 'love' children they may not want to hurt them. Don't think I'm morally defending them though - the ones who don't seek help should be forced to get that help.
Paedosadists, on the other hand, do not love children. They are monsters. Hence their prevalence in the cabal/criminocracy (the serious child abuse network - see the igsp studies article beyond dutroux, if you can stomach it). What they enjoy is not, actually, sexual attraction, it's the power over others. Given that deep down they are weak and inferior and so on, they have to pick on people smaller than them. Thus, children (and women, sometimes). They also hate the innocence of children and hope to corrupt them. Evil reproducing itself and such like.
it explains a lot about the cabal and their entire motivations for seeking world domination and inflicting terror and cruelty and such like on humanity. Sadism, certainly. The infamous Marquis being one of them. Interestingly, so was a guy called Gilles de Rais, who was the 'mentor' of Joan of Arc... So it goes back quite some way.
Terry Lo’s not a PEDOPHILE. Sexually speaking, he’s quite normal. (((Ben Levin))) may well be one. Daglish, I dunno. I’m uncertain about him. He’s a child molester though.
2018: "Former Calgary politician Terry Lo pleads guilty to charges including child luring, will serve 2.5-year sentence."
2015: "Ben Levin, Ontario's former deputy education minister, walks into Finch Ave court ahead of being sentenced to three years prison for child porn offences on Friday, May 29, 2015."
Quite common for abusers to gain access through aid work.
The UN and Oxfam have appalling records that are easily searched.
"Peter Daglish was a Canadian national who served as the Country Representative for UN-Habitat in Afghanistan until 2015. He was also the founder of the Street Kids International charity.
He was arrested on April 8, 2018, by Nepal Police on charges of pedophilia and child sex trafficking. The charges were related to his interactions with two boys under the age of 15.
Daglish was convicted and is currently serving an 8-year prison term in Nepal.
His involvement in high-profile projects supporting street- and war-affected children in Afghanistan raises concerns that he might have been involved in similar child abuse and exploitation cases during his interactions with Afghan children."
He likes them young all right. But pedophilia is not a crime anywhere on Earth and on its own, it’s harmless. It is a dangerous condition though because the only way they can get off is with a kid. And many collect child porn.
The aid industry does probably have more than a few pedophiles, hebephiles and child molesters in it.
The child sex abuse article is short on details. The only accusation is peacekeepers in Haiti having sex with teenage girl prostitutes, some of whom may have been underage. Whoop tee doo.
And you can’t crack down on pedophilia 😂. Pedophilia is a way of thinking and feeling. It’s not possible to crack down on such things.
They mention speculation that the girl was 17 and then quote the father saying, “She was much, much younger than that” so doesn’t that confirm she was a minor at the time?
Big of you to admit but I don’t think your’re completely wrong. It’s common knowledge around here (folklore? Urban legend?) that the girl at point grey was 14 and her family was paid off.
I’m looking for the links I used to have about this, and his Pickton pig farm connections.
Awesome follow-up and kudos to you for being willing to consider new info and reexamine assumptions! Well played!
... I still hate Trudeau though lol
Thanks! I know my audience - for sure people know that everyone makes mistakes. Better to fess up than hope no one notices.
What we do know is that JT is a "dickhead" who coerced Canadians to take an experimental mRNA genetic therapy toxin causing untold death, misery, and suffering.
Those who dared to protest in pursuit of bodily autonomy were dismissed as kooks, fascists, or white supremacists. Many protestors ultimately had their personal bank accounts frozen.
COVID revealed that JT is an authoritarian A-hole who the national security state and multinational corporations lead by the nose.
So it wouldn't be surprising, if JT's depraved activities provides a way for intelligence agencies to extort control over his political decisions.
agreed.
Most people see what they want to.
It's interesting, isn't it? Kinda crazy how much difference a better photo makes...
I'm going to take this as a lesson not to jump to conclusions so much... If he is guilty I've now weakened the case against him.
I'm fairly good at French, having lived here in la France profonde for nearly 15 years now, and I reckon that's a mistranslation of her social media comment - I don't think it says '17 years ago', it was 'our first date *at* 17.' If it was 'ago' wouldn't it be 'il y a 17 ans'? As you, I am however willing to stand corrected. But the girl in the pic certainly looks around 17 to me.
Very good of you to fess up, btw. Having said that, it seems your clickbait really worked, considering the number of views. And 28 new subs! I've only got 38 subs right now, so 28 from one post sounds like hitting a little jack in the pot.
Maybe I'll have to think about a scandalous clickbait post of my own. Hmm... Ah! no! I'll get ChatGPT to write me one! Hah!
yeah, there's no denying it! people really like celebrity gossip!
I'm fine with giving people what they want, but not if it's misleading.
I posted a clickbait one about Russell Brand but it didn't get the same traction: https://nevermoremedia.substack.com/p/is-russell-brand-a-pedophile
I read the one about Brand. I was thinking I might give him a cameo in my Katrina story, when she starts making movies. She's got an alternative Eurovision comedy musical lined up. That Lawrence Fox bloke too. All for a bit of controversy.
I've read Brand's first autobiography 'My Booky-Wook' where he talks about his addictions, to drugs and sex (you can see where they got the material from), and the book does start with him in a rehab clinic for his sex addiction. He colourfully talks about how he's not even allowed to have a wank, and he's in the clinic with a few other reprobates including, interestingly, a paedo. The fact that he talks about the paedo as a kind of 'other' - i.e. not like himself - is revealing.
I have no doubt whatsoever that Brand is not a paedo. Hebephile almost certainly, but then again I think you made the point that this applies to pretty much every hetero male on the planet. This is just biology, the fact that people become sexual around the ages of say 13 onwards. For most people at that time they fancy each other and they're all, what, 13, 14, 15. Except we don't accuse them of being hebephiles. Sure, most people's sexual preferences age as they do, but there is a limit which I would say is when you hit your prime, say ages 18-24 or so. In other words, the vast majority of men fancy women aged 18-24. But that can include women aged 16-17, and even some 15 year olds who simply matured a little faster.
Maybe that includes Trudeau - seeing as the girl in the photo as you say could be anywhere between 14-19 or so. She has a very young looking face (a lot of French girls in their prime are like that actually).
So I can well imagine Brand, especially intoxicated, would end up in bed with a 16 year old, but reading his book he's absolutely not the kind of guy to force himself on anyone - as you say, he never needed to because he had chicks lining up to sleep with him.
As for him being controlled opposition - an alternative take on that would be he was given the proverbial offer you can't refuse, combined with a threat, but he did refuse to be blackmailed. So, they went ahead and spread scurrilous shit all over the MSM. I think that's a valid theory.
Also, when we think of CO, we mustn't assume that everyone in the alt media has done all the research on every topic, and so they will have blind spots in their views, simply by not having done the research (yet) - so it seems like they are peddling the official line when the truth is they simply haven't examined that topic yet. Likewise, all of us will start off with an instinctive hypothesis/conclusion but then maybe change it in due course.
It's the people who stick to the same line, or one that serves the Establishment, despite having been presented with the evidence, who should be treated with suspicion.
Anyhow - I certainly approve of you doing a few clickbait type gossip if each one gets you 28 new subs who may then also read the brilliant and thought-provoking stuff you usually do. Means to an end type thing, you know...
Some very interesting points about the CO Accusation Game, Brand, and sexual proclivities. Out of curiosity though, wouldn't that make Brand (and it would seem many hetero men) an ephebophile as opposed to a hebephile? I suppose the "-phile" designation entails an active preference though, not just the odd attraction to a particularly (perhaps even deceptively) mature-looking individual of a younger age, so they may not actually fall into that category.
I don’t know! I never used either the term hebephilia or ephebophilia until a couple of days ago.
I don’t actually know what the difference between the two terms is!
But I guess if I just called myself a semanticist I should take an interest in such things.
What do you think the distinction is?
I had to look up "hebephile" haha and that's when I stumbled on to "ephebephile" and realized that apparently there is a technical difference there. Basically I just looked at Wikipedia, and they have the prior at 11-14 and the latter at 15-18, which seems more in line with the discussion.
Yeah I honestly was just going to forget it as being way too pedantic and "akshully!" to worth mentioning, but since the posts were directly grappling with the semantics at play here I figured it was worth a quick mention.
oh dang, okay so it is a pretty major distinction. Good to know! I'll adopt your usage.
Yes, you're right - I had simply never encountered that term 'ephebophile' before (I had to look it up!). But yes, that's the right word. Thanks!
No worries! As I said in reply to Nevermore above, it is not something I had really know about either but your thoughtful resposne got me looking into it as well, and that's when I stumbled upon the different terminology. Cheers!
It didn’t get the same traction because it’s not as believable.
LOL
No, I’m sure you aren’t wrong about him! (just the girl in the picture!)
😹😹😹
Good job - the original story, the follow-up acknowledgment of an error, and stay on it…there’s a reason he slimed away so quickly from Point Grey…it will come out.
I love how you admit it when you’re wrong! That’s so big of you. Also I appreciate how you understand the meaning of that stupid word PEDOPHILE.
Thanks! I'm pretty big on semantics to be honest. I like winning debates, and usually the people with a better grasp of definitions of key terms will win any given debate.
Some terms seem designed to muddy thinking, like "antisemitism". Pedophilia comes from the greek words for "child" and "love", meaning that if the word were used correctly, a pedophile would refer to someone who loves children.
Of course, many words are used in etymologically incorrect ways and you can't get around certain words. But certain words do stuck get stuck in my craw because they make communication more difficult. If we're talking about sex offenders who abuse children, let's not act they're motivated by love. "Pedosadists" would be a more accurate term.
I totally agree about using the right term for child abusers - abusers do not, in any way, 'love' their victims. Paedosadists is absolutely the correct word.
One definite distinction is in the psychology - paedophiles, in my view, have a kind of 'disorder of sexual development', in other words it's an obvious mental illness and there are indeed paedophiles who seek help for it, because they have the right degree of self-awareness and, ironically, because they 'love' children they may not want to hurt them. Don't think I'm morally defending them though - the ones who don't seek help should be forced to get that help.
Paedosadists, on the other hand, do not love children. They are monsters. Hence their prevalence in the cabal/criminocracy (the serious child abuse network - see the igsp studies article beyond dutroux, if you can stomach it). What they enjoy is not, actually, sexual attraction, it's the power over others. Given that deep down they are weak and inferior and so on, they have to pick on people smaller than them. Thus, children (and women, sometimes). They also hate the innocence of children and hope to corrupt them. Evil reproducing itself and such like.
it explains a lot about the cabal and their entire motivations for seeking world domination and inflicting terror and cruelty and such like on humanity. Sadism, certainly. The infamous Marquis being one of them. Interestingly, so was a guy called Gilles de Rais, who was the 'mentor' of Joan of Arc... So it goes back quite some way.
He has lots of dubious connex in addition to his best friend:
Trudeau and convicted pedophile Ben Levin
Trudeau and neo-Nazi Andriy Parubiy
Trudeau and convicted pedophile Terry Lo
Trudeau and convicted pedophile Peter Dalglish
Trudeau and terrorist Jaspal Atwal
Trudeau and Joshua Boyle
https://tnc.news/2022/08/23/trudeau-pedos-terrorists-extremists/
Terry Lo’s not a PEDOPHILE. Sexually speaking, he’s quite normal. (((Ben Levin))) may well be one. Daglish, I dunno. I’m uncertain about him. He’s a child molester though.
2018: "Former Calgary politician Terry Lo pleads guilty to charges including child luring, will serve 2.5-year sentence."
2015: "Ben Levin, Ontario's former deputy education minister, walks into Finch Ave court ahead of being sentenced to three years prison for child porn offences on Friday, May 29, 2015."
With Levin the CP was the bad stuff. He was a member of a boy lovers forum on the Net.
The child luring is bullshit. Those were two teenage girls. Whoop tee do.
Quite common for abusers to gain access through aid work.
The UN and Oxfam have appalling records that are easily searched.
"Peter Daglish was a Canadian national who served as the Country Representative for UN-Habitat in Afghanistan until 2015. He was also the founder of the Street Kids International charity.
He was arrested on April 8, 2018, by Nepal Police on charges of pedophilia and child sex trafficking. The charges were related to his interactions with two boys under the age of 15.
Daglish was convicted and is currently serving an 8-year prison term in Nepal.
His involvement in high-profile projects supporting street- and war-affected children in Afghanistan raises concerns that he might have been involved in similar child abuse and exploitation cases during his interactions with Afghan children."
Those boys were 11 and 14. That’s pretty young. The 11 year old makes him a Childs molester for sure.
He likes them young all right. But pedophilia is not a crime anywhere on Earth and on its own, it’s harmless. It is a dangerous condition though because the only way they can get off is with a kid. And many collect child porn.
The aid industry does probably have more than a few pedophiles, hebephiles and child molesters in it.
Rapists full stop. They abuse the most vulnerable people in conflict and disaster zones.
Ex-UN Official Accuses Aid Workers of 60,000 Rapes in 10 Years
https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Ex-UN-Official-Accuses-Aid-Workers-of-60000-Rapes-in-10-Years-20180214-0032.html
"When it comes to child sex abuse in aid work, the Oxfam revelations are just the tip of the iceberg"
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/oxfam-aid-work-prostitutes-un-workers-child-sex-abuse-harassment-dfid-a8204526.html
The child sex abuse article is short on details. The only accusation is peacekeepers in Haiti having sex with teenage girl prostitutes, some of whom may have been underage. Whoop tee doo.
And you can’t crack down on pedophilia 😂. Pedophilia is a way of thinking and feeling. It’s not possible to crack down on such things.
60,000 rapes is bad stuff though.
https://buffalochronicle.com/2019/10/19/trudeaus-west-grey-accusor-was-much-younger-than-first-thought/
I actually quote from that article... It's worth noting that it's weird that the Buffalo Chronicle would get this scoop... I'd never even heard of it.
They mention speculation that the girl was 17 and then quote the father saying, “She was much, much younger than that” so doesn’t that confirm she was a minor at the time?
yes, but questions remain. What is the father's name? Why didn't he go to Canadian media?
The subsequent request by the Privy Council to FB to take down info pertaining to this makes it seem more credible...
but this could be fake news. It seems believable but isn't proven.
Big of you to admit but I don’t think your’re completely wrong. It’s common knowledge around here (folklore? Urban legend?) that the girl at point grey was 14 and her family was paid off.
I’m looking for the links I used to have about this, and his Pickton pig farm connections.
He is a Zionist stooge and probably a fag