Is RFK controlled opposition?

Or will he defend C.J. Hopkins against bogus charges of anti-semitism?

DISCLAIMER AND CORRECTION - (JULY 2)

I would like to publicly apologize to CJ Hopkins for offending him by calling on his friend Robert F. Kennedy to publicly defend him against bogus charges of anti-semitism.

I meant well, but CJ has made it clear that he doesn’t want my support.

I alone am responsible for my words, and I don’t want my words to reflect badly on my fellow Nevermore contributors.

Some of my collaborators have told me that I’ve gone too far, and I should really dial it back. I intend to take their advice.

I considered taking down this post, and decided against it for now. If enough people tell me that I should, I will.

This isn’t only because that it is generating more engagement than most things I post, but also because I think the question of whether or not the truth movement should trust RFK is an important one.

I also think the question of what to do about the weaponization of accusations of anti-semitism is important. My argument basically boils down to this - if people are afraid of being accused of being anti-semitic, they’re going to keep using it as a cudgel to beat down critics of the New Normal Fascism. I’m not afraid of being accused of anti-semitism, so I thought I was doing something good by being willing to stick my neck out. Unfortunately, CJ doesn’t see things that way.

I spent a lot of time writing my article, and suspect that the reason that CJ didn’t like it wasn’t because my critique wasn’t valid, but because being associated with wingnuts like me could be bad for his reputation. Fair enough.

Ultimately, I wish him the best of luck with his case, and I hope that other people continue to support him.

My friends tell me that I should print some corrections as well, which I will do, even though I think that the errors that I made are not that important to the main thrust of the argument that I am making.

In my piece, I make reference to CJ being charged with “bogus charges of anti-semitism”. In reality, he is charged with “disseminating propaganda, the contents of which are intended to further the aims of a former National Socialist organization.”

He was not specifically charged with “trivializing the Holocaust”. The person who was charged with that was Dr. Sucharit Bhakti.

Profiles in Courage: Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi

Furthermore, I state that CJ Hopkins used to be “a member of the Nevermore team” because he gave us permission to repost his work and to be listed as a contributor on our website. This was the limit of his involvement with our collective, and he doesn't consider himself to have ever been “a member of the Nevermore team”. I apologize for any misunderstanding this may have caused.

Lastly, I stated that he quit Nevermore after I pissed him off in a debate about whether or not lawyers should exist.

It has been pointed out to me that, according to him, the real reason that he requested to be removed from our list of contributors was because he doesn’t believe in being part of any group that would have him as a member.

Although it seemed to me that he quit because I pissed him off, that is nothing more than a perception in my mind.

In any case, if I’m making enemies of people I admire, it means I fucked up.

Since the beginning of this year, I’ve made it my thing to say controversial things on purpose, but if my friends are telling me to knock it off, that means that I’ve officially gone too far, and I should dial it back.

I still hope that something positive comes from the fact that I raised these issues, and I would appreciate it if folks would be so kind as to share advice in the comment sections so that I can learn from this snafu and do better in the future.

I have left the piece below intact so people can judge for themselves how bad my transgressions were.

Anyway, I wish CJ all the best, and I’m going to shut up now.

- Crow Qu’appelle

IS RFK CONTROLLED OPPOSITION?

“C.J. Hopkins is our modern Jeremiah. No other prophet has described the strategies or predicted the perils of the emerging totalitarian with such persistence and eloquence.”

- Robert F. Kennedy

Robert F. Kennedy is a fan of C.J. Hopkins. Not only has he hailed him as a modern prophet, he has also interviewed him on his podcast, the Defender.

A quote from RFK features prominently on the cover of the satirist’s latest book, which, by the way, has landed our good pal C. Jeremiah Hopkins in some hot water.

On June 8th, C.J. announced that he is being charged with: “disseminating propaganda, the contents of which are intended to further the aims of a former National Socialist organization,” which is punishable by “imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine.”

His crime? Comparing the tyranny of the German biosecurity state during COVID to the totalitarianism of the Nazi regime of the 20th century.

As C.J. puts it:

“The first rule of New Normal Germany is that you do not compare New Normal Germany to Nazi Germany.”

This is a big deal, people. We’ve all done this.

Margaret Anna Alice, for instance, has compared the jab campaign to the Holocaust much more explicitly than C.J. has.

Letter to a Holocaust Denier

A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation

If they’re going after C.J., it could be any one of us next.

I don’t say this to be alarmist. I point this out to say that we need to have each other’s backs when the chips are down.

As the Anarchist Historical Re-enactment Society likes to say:

(Apparently, they don’t believe that maxim should apply to vaccine injuries, but who cares what they think?)

C.J. is one of us, and has come under fire for doing things that we support. It behooves us to stand in solidarity with him.

Perhaps a thought experiment would be useful here. If you were in his shoes, how would you want people to support you?

Part of the reason that I left Canada is that I figured that the way things were going, it was only a matter of time before they started up rounding up dissidents.

Maybe that sounds paranoid, but you have to understand that I’m already under investigation for eco-terrorism.

Think I’m joking? I’m not.

C.J. IS ONE OF US

Now, C.J. used to be officially a member of the Nevermore team, but unfortunately I pissed him off in a debate about whether lawyers should exist or not, and he quit.

He’s the only contributor we’ve ever lost, and the loss still stings. Almost makes me want to be less of an asshole, but being an asshole is kinda my thing, you know?

Maybe I can get back into his good graces by coming to his defence in his hour of need. Or maybe I’ll dig myself in deeper. I guess we’ll see.

Because I don’t want to risk offending him, I’m going to go easy on the jokes in this piece, and I’m going to resist the temptation to give C.J. any unsolicited advice about dealing with lawyers.

I will say one thing, though - the process is the punishment.

You’re probably not going to go to jail, and the charges will probably get thrown out, like in the case of Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi.

Profiles in Courage: Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi

They’ll probably waste a bunch of your time and money, and worst of all, cause you months of extremely irksome, slow-burning stress, in which fear, indignation, and rage commingle. Trust me. I’ve been through the wringer more than once.

It works on the same principle as Chinese water torture. It’s a low-level of agitation, but it’s constant, and it wears away at you. It sucks fucking donkey nuts, and it’s infuriating that the so-called “justice system” is used in such a way.

The only way to win is to achieve equanimity, which is a lot easier when you feel that 1) what you did was worth it, and 2) people care.

That’s why I’m calling on RFK to come to C.J.’s defence.

Yo, Bobby-boy, you realize you have the power to alleviate C.J.’s mental suffering and score some political points at the same time, right?

What the fuck are you waiting for?

HOW COMMITTED IS RFK TO THE CAUSE OF FREE SPEECH?

I’m cynical about politicians, and when RFK announced that he was running for president, I was less than totally thrilled.

I have a lot of respect for RFK, but personally think that he should know better than to dignify the disgusting charade of electoral politics by participating in it.

That said, RFK is a movement hero for his tireless advocacy for medical freedom, not to mention his decades of praiseworthy environmental activism.

If ever there were someone perfectly suited to play the role of the hero, it is him.

The case of C.J. Hopkins provides a chance to test how committed Robert F. Kennedy is to the cause of freedom, free speech, and the values that he has so eloquently espoused over the course of his career.

I hereby call on RFK to issue a statement of solidarity with C.J. Hopkins, defending the satirist against the bogus charges of anti-semitism with which he is being smeared.

Towards the end of this article, I will also offer some specific suggestions about how RFK might show solidarity with everyone’s favourite modern-day prophet.

Let’s keep in mind that the satirist is charged criminally for comparing the COVID jab campaign to the Holocaust.

Given the fact that millions of people worldwide have been killed in this injection campaign, the comparison is fair.

When the Powers That Shouldn’t Be use criminal charges to stifle dissent, they are doing so to make an example of one person in order to dissuade and discourage others from speaking up.

If we clamp our jaws, they win. Are we gonna let C.J. suffer alone?

Make no mistake - just because C.J. is acting cool and making jokes about his situation, but that doesn’t mean that he’s not suffering. Trust me. I’ve been there. It sucks to have criminal charges hanging over your head. I call this paying the brain tax, and it’s not fun.

There’s a reason that people facing charges often lash out at their friends and comrades. It’s because facing charges makes you feel powerless and you tend to feel like no one cares, even when they assure you they do. The fact is that no one else can care about your problems like you can.

Also, lawyers are expensive. Who’s paying for C.J.’s lawyer? If he’s paying for his own lawyer, that’s fucked. If he has to pay out of pocket, it doesn’t matter if he beats the case. He still got raped in the ass. Are we a movement or not?

C.J. may not be an anarchist, but I consider him a comrade. He is one of us, and it is a moral duty for us to support him.

If you don’t lift a finger for him, why should anyone be there for you when the state comes a-knocking?

The way I see things, the fact that the Great Reset currently seems to be on pause is an illusion, and that it’s only a matter of time before the next phase of the plan begins.

I still think that it’s just a matter of time before they start rounding up dissidents. I’m still in exile, if you' haven’t noticed.

Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?

SO WHAT SHOULD WE DO?

This is a question for each person to answer for themselves, but here are a few things that come to mind:

1. Make a big deal about C.J.’s case.

2. Pressure higher profile activists to publicly support him.

3. Talk about the Holocaust.

   It’s clear that the Powers That Shouldn’t Be really don’t like it when you compare other atrocities to the Holocaust. Why? As an Israeli conspiracy theorist I interviewed pointed out, one of the central myths of Zionism is that the Holocaust was a unique event in world history, which isn’t true.

   Over a hundred million people were murdered by statists over the course of the 20th century, but we are to believe that there were six million deaths in particular that are more important than the rest (because Jewish Lives Matter More), and that those deaths justify statism. It’s an insult to the human capacity for reason.

   It’s obscene, it’s evil, and it’s wrong. I’m sick of it, and I say enough already. Fuck this bullshit.

IT’S TIME TO CALL THE HOLOCAUST CARD

Several months ago, I declared war on feminism in a couple of pieces called The Most Sexist Thing Imaginable and Bitches Ain’t Shit But Hoes and Tricks.

In The Most Sexist Thing Imaginable call the feminist trump card, which is that rape is a unique type of experience which only women experience, which is different and worse than anything a man could ever understand.

Obviously, that’s bullshit, given that a lot of men have been raped, and rape is not as bad as many things that men do experience, such as torture.

Throughout the #MeToo psy op, feminists played the Rape card so much that they devalued it. At a certain point, I reached the point where I said “Fuck this” and called them on their bullshit. And I gotta be honest with you. It worked great.

It’s time to do the same thing with the Holocaust card.

Let’s be real. C.J. didn’t get charged because he trivialized the Holocaust. He got charged because he’s challenging totalitarianism.

The irony is the ones trivializing the Holocaust are the ones instrumentalizing it to silence dissent.

If people really cared about preventing genocide, they’d be paying more attention to what’s going on in China, Armenia, and Canada.

Rape is wrong, and genocide is wrong. So is racism, including the false belief that Jewish Lives Matter More.

If you didn’t know, Israel has been selling arms to the Azeris, who have attacking the Armenians with the support of Turkey. As far as I’m aware, this is an event without historic parallels. The same people who were responsible for the first American genocide, who have never acknowledged their crimes, have returned to attack the same people their ancestors tried their best to wipe off the face of the Earth.

Kinda seems like they want to finish the job, doesn’t it?

I really hope that the term “Second Armenian genocide” doesn’t appear in the history books, but I have a feeling it might.

This is a big fucking deal, and guess what? The media doesn’t care, and they want you to believe that the problem with the world is that people are so unfair to Jews, who, by the way, happen to own the media.

If some of the people who happen to be profiting from an ethnic blood feud happen to be Jewish, that has nothing to do with them being Jewish, does it?

Everyone’s gotta put food on the table, right?

I’m not so sure. If you know anything about the history of how the Rothschilds funded the first Armenian genocide, it almost seems like the Sabbatean-Frankists have some ancient blood feud with the Armenians or something. I have no idea why, but it kinda seems they want to exterminate them, doesn’t it?

And we’re supposed to believe that these people care about preventing genocide?

Suck a fucking dick.

SHOULD WE TRUST RFK?

Back in April, C. Jeremiah penned a noteworthy piece called “The Great Divide”, in which he offers some unsolicited advice to RFK.

The Great Divide

In it, he writes:

Fuck them. They’re not going to let you win, anyway. They are going to smear you, slime you, demonize you, distort every other thing you say, and just generally lie about who you are and what you believe in and what you stand for. They are going to paint you as a bull-goose-loony, formerly smack-addled, conspiracy-theorizing, anti-vax fanatic no matter what you do. If you tone down your act and try to “heal the divide” and “end the division,” they are going to have you for lunch, and then sit around picking their teeth with your bones. You know, and I know, and the American people know, that the things you say you want to do as president — which I know you sincerely want to do as president and are crazy enough to actually try to do, i.e., “to end the corrupt merger of state and corporate power that is threatening now to impose a new kind of corporate feudalism in our country” — are things ... well, as Michael Corleone once put it, that they would "use all their power to keep from happening."

So, fuck it, and fuck them. Tell the truth.

Not the ready-for-prime-time truth. Not the toned-down-for-mainstream-consumption truth. The truth. The ugly, unvarnished truth. The scary, crazy-sounding truth. The angry, divisive, uncensored truth.

I’m guessing that CJ wasn’t expecting Kennedy to respond, but he did.

Well, now. Isn’t that interesting? I wonder if he’s going to tell the truth about Israel? Do you think RFK will have the balls to tell the “angry, divisive, uncensored” truth about how the Zionists been deeply involved with organized crime since before the Israel even became a country?

I wonder if he’ll tell the truth about the network that enabled Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Leslie Wexner and others to get away with pimping minors out to politicians and businessmen?

That would be pretty neat! I wonder what he’s waiting for?

WHY I HAVE MY DOUBTS ABOUT RFK

I am an admirer of RFK, but I have to admit, I have my doubts about him.

Why? Because a couple of years ago, I saw a debate that he did with Alan Dershowitz.

If you don’t know who Alan Dershowitz is, he was Epstein’s lawyer, and has been accused of sex crimes involving minors.

You’ll have to watch the first few minutes of the debate to see why it set off alarm bells for me. Apparently, RFK couldn’t get anyone to debate him on the subject of vaccines, so he paid Dershowitz to take the pro-vaccine side.

I guess it shows integrity that RFK states up front that the debate is staged, and it says a lot about the vaccine debate that no one in the world actually believes in vaccines enough to think that they can win a debate against an expert.

As RFK makes clear, he and Allan Dershowitz are personal friends, and also have a business relationship.

The fact that RFK is so chummy with Epstein’s lawyer doesn't sit quite right with me, but maybe I’m a little fucked-up in the head or something.

I happened to see the staged debate not long after watching an awful, disgusting, boner-killing Netflix series called Filthy Rich, which is about Jeffrey Epstein.

Those of you who saw it will probably remember Dershowitz. He was the guy who angrily threatened to sue if Netflix dared air the accusations of Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre, who claims to have had sex with Dershowitz multiple times.

He followed through on his threat, by the way. He currently suing Netflix for besmirching his good name. This guy was Epstein’s lawyer, and he intends to use the “justice system” as a cudgel to silence his critics. That’s where we’re at, folks. And RFK is his personal friend.

I don’t know about you, but I think it’s fair to judge people by the company they keep, because birds of a feather flock together. I don’t have any friends that are anywhere near as vile and disgusting as Alan Dershowitz. Do you?

I know C.J. doesn’t like it when I talk shit about lawyers, so I’m going to watch my words here.

I like to be up front with my biases, and the truth is that I kinda have an itsy-bitsy trust issue when it comes to lawyers.

Because RFK is a lawyer, I am prejudiced against him. I’m just being honest here.

That said, I do have one very dear life-long friend who used to be a Canadian constitutional lawyer, so I don’t hate all lawyers. I just don’t think that lawyers shouldn’t exist, period, and that as a class they are a scourge upon humanity. As individuals, many of them are good people, and some of them are heroes.

Because of the Dershowitz-Kennedy connection, I suspected that RFK, as a prominent member of the Democratic Party and the American ruling class, was probably controlled opposition. I tend towards hyper vigilance, and any connection to a political party is a big red flag in my book.

But then my friend Margaret Anna Alice insisted that I absolutely must read his book, The Real Anthony Fauci. She was very convincing, as she often is.

I took her advice, and it blew my mind. I couldn't believe how absolutely rotten to the core the scientific-industrial complex has gotten in the U.S. I knew things were bad, but I had no idea how bad.

The 800-page book catalogues, in meticulous detail, how Anthony Fauci turned an obscure government agency called the NIAID into a massive criminal enterprise that had made a killing off of hyping up fake health crises in order to sell false solutions to non-existent problems for decades.

This shit makes my blood boil. You know how the Sith feed off fear? That’s what this is. It’s evil, it’s sickening, and I hate it.

Am I the only one who feels like we have the right to live in a world where fear isn’t forced down our throats so that capitalist swine can sell people shit they don’t need?

It is hard to imagine someone more despicable than Anthony Fauci. Hitler, Stalin, and Mao all had far more redeeming qualities than this living facsimile of human fecal matter. And RFK took him down.

RFK’s book proves that regulatory capture has occurred in the U.S.A. The agencies that are supposed to oversee the pharmaceutical industry have been corrupted to the point where they are unable to serve their purpose.

I don’t think that people really understand what a huge deal this is. It’s worse than lunatics taking over the asylum. It’s more like pederasts taking over the orphanage.

RFK’s book is a tour de force and I highly recommend it to anyone. After reading it, I viewed Kennedy with respect, despite the fact that he is both a lawyer and a member of an elite ruling class family.

As cynical as I am about politicians and members of the power establishment, I’m a firm believer in giving credit where credit is due. The Real Anthony Fauci is an excellent book which came out at a crucial time, and I owe a debt of gratitude to RFK for opening my eyes to the AIDS scam.

Now that RFK has announced his candidacy for presidency, however, I think that we need to regard Kennedy as a politician.

Remember Bernie? Was that movie really so good you want to watch it again?

WILL RFK BE THE NEXT BERNIE SANDERS?

The Democratic Party likes to present a more palatable candidate as a way of funnelling young people’s energy into supporting the dead-end, go-nowhere bullshit of electoral politics.

RFK certainly fits the bill here, and whatever his intentions are, once you are playing the game of politics you will be used by others to suit their own agenda.

If RFK is running for the Democratic Party, do you not think that members of the Democratic Party are going to be in a position to influence him in some way?

I don’t want to rain on anyone’s parade, but experience has taught me that when it comes to electoral politics, you can never really be cynical enough.

Now that we know that Noam Chomsky, the guy who wrote Manufacturing Consent, was controlled opposition, is it really that crazy to think that RFK might be too?

Remember, politicians say what people want to hear so that they get votes. That’s their job. When RFK says that he intends to take on the CIA, we should keep this in mind.

The CIA isn’t popular, so presenting himself as their enemy could be a good career move. Actually opposing the CIA, on the other hand, very likely would not be a good career move, and would likely result in a one-way trip to Valhalla.

So, should we trust RFK? Well, I am firmly in the “Never Trust a Politician” camp, and I tend not to trust people who are from dynastic families. Blood is thicker than water, and they have more in common with their fellow elitists than they do with the likes of us.

Arnold Schwarzenegger, for instance, is married to a Kennedy. Given his extreme anti-freedom stance during COVID, that alone should give us pause.

I believe that it’s only a matter of time before Arnold Schwarzenegger is president, by the way. Wouldn’t he make the perfect wartime leader once the U.S. goes full-on fash?

Obviously, it’s just a matter of time before there’s some kind of coup in the U.S. WWIII basically necessitates it. I kinda figure that the Bush family are planning it, but maybe the Kennedys are in on it.

I’m guessing that they’ve got a plan to seize control of the U.S. government and install the Terminator as Fuhrer, just in time for the End of Days.

For those of you who say that Schwarzenegger can’t be president because he wasn’t born in the U.S., do you really think that’s going to matter after Israel blows up the Al-Aqsa mosque?

AIN’T NO POLITICIANS GONNA SAVE US

If people are going to hail RFK as some kind of saviour riding in on a white horse to rescue the American Dream from the jaws of bad apples like Fauci, all I can do is shake my head.

I know that someone once said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results, but that’s not accurate at all.

As one of the world’s leading authorities on sanity and insanity, I can definitely assure you that is not a good definition of insanity. I’m kinda surprised that anyone thinks insane people are that boring.

Doing the same thing over an over again and expecting different results is a great definition of stupidity, though. If you believe in electoral politics at this point, you are stupid. I’m sorry to be crass, but it’s true.

We’ve all seen this movie time and time again. Obama was hailed as a hero for not being Bush. Trudeau was hailed as a hero for not being Harper. A lot of people got really excited about Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders, not to mention Trump. In each case, the results were disappointing.

But who knows? Maybe this time will be different. Maybe RFK is the next AMLO.

But I doubt it. Mexico is under the protection of the Virgin of Guadalupe.

America is not.

I hate to break it to any heroic American patriots out there, but America’s karma is coming due, and it’s not going to be pretty.

That’s right.

Y’all getting smote.

NO ONE CAN STOP WHAT’S BEEN SET INTO MOTION

Meanwhile, things keep moving in the same direction that they’ve been moving in all along. I hate to be a Debbie Downer, but the political situation in the U.S. has been getting steadily worse for over twenty years now, and it’s unrealistic to expect one person, however well-intentioned, to reverse this trend.

Western civilization is decadent, degenerate, and depraved, and the historical process that is in motion must come to its natural conclusion. We can no more stop it than we can stop an avalanche or tsunami.

Immortal Technique put it best:

The system can never stop what's been set into motion
Like volcanic eruptions on the floor of the ocean

IS RFK DIFFERENT FROM OTHER POLITICIANS?

Now, I agree that RFK is a special case, for a few different reasons. If for no other reason than exposing the AIDS scam, he definitely deserves his status as movement hero.

Seriously, go read his book. It will blow your mind. It turns out that the HIV virus was just as fake as SARS-CoV-2. Wrap your mind around that one.

Heroic journalists like Celia Farber toiled away on this issue for decades, but if it wasn’t for RFK, the truth may never have come to light.

The Real Anthony Fauci was a bestseller, which means that the cat is out of the bag about the AIDS scam now.

Unfortunately, this news comes a little late, given that Big Pharma has already moved on from AIDS, but better late than never, right?

If you want to understand the COVID scam, you should really read RFK’s book. It’s seriously fucking deadly. Its revelations are way too complicated to summarize, but if you read the book, you’ll see what I mean.

If nothing else, I think that you’ll be convinced that a whole helluvalotta skulduggery went on during the AIDS crisis.

You wouldn’t think that an 800-page book dealing with the intricacies of fraudulent clinical trials and bureaucratic intrigue would be a page-turner, but it is, which itself is quite the accomplishment.

The Real Anthony Fauci is also available as an audiobook, which I highly recommend.

They also made it into a movie.

WHO BETTER THAN RFK TO PLAY THE ROLE OF A HERO?

All this makes me want to be in RFK’s corner. As much as I hate politicians, I don’t think that they’re all equally bad.

Some of you will have noticed that I never say anything bad about AMLO, the president of Mexico. That’s not just because he’s the most famous person in the world who is on record acknowledging the existence of interdimensional fairy folk. It’s also because he’s just way better than most politicians, and I don’t go out of my way looking for things to complain about. If a politician’s not pissing me off, I’ll usually ignore them.

If you were to cast someone as a credible saviour, you couldn’t do much better than RFK.

Given the fact that the C.I.A. (probably) murdered his father and uncle, it’s tempting to believe him when he says that he’s going to take on the C.I.A., which would of course be one of the best things that any American political leader could do.

That’s a lot easier said than done, though.

WHAT DOES RFK MEAN WHEN HE PROMISES TO BE A CHAMPION OF ISRAEL?

Not too long ago, Ryan Christian (from the Last American Vagabond) and Etienne de la Boetie2 (from The Art of Liberty), appeared on a talk show called AM WakeUp to discuss the fact that RFK has stated that he intends to be a “champion of Israel”.

I don’t know about you, but I think that this should give us pause.

There is a long-standing tradition that American presidents never, ever oppose the will of Israel’s rulers.

Take a second to think about it. Can you think of a single presidential candidate who has ever voiced a scathing critique of Israel?

Me neither. Truth be told, I can’t even summon to mind the kind of mild, mealy-mouthed critique that a slimy politician might make to get votes.

Obviously, the fact that all U.S. presidents appear to kowtow to Israel does not mean that Zionists control the executive branch of the U.S. government.

If that were the case, the media surely would have informed the public, right?

Nor does the fact that Israel regularly demand billions of dollars in “aid” mean that the Zionist state is exacting tribute from America. It’s not like that. It’s different.

How, you ask? Well, obviously, the word “tribute” is antiquated and no one uses it anymore. Let’s move on.

As Ryan points out, RFK has so far done exact same thing that all other candidates do when it comes to Israel: toe the party line. In Ryan’s words:

You will not even be allowed on the stage unless you first say “I blindly support Israel no matter what”.

If this is RFK’s stance, then how different is he really from any other politician?

RFK Jr. & Understanding Zionist/Statist Domination of “Government”, Media and Banking

As Ryan goes on to say:

On medical freedom, he’s knocking it out of the park. But is that the only thing we care about?

I think that a question worth asking is this: How much will RFK really be able to accomplish if he is not willing to oppose Israel? Do you think that he’s going to be able to take on the C.I.A. without pissing off Mossad? Not likely.

I don’t see how it would be possible for RFK to take on the C.I.A. without making enemies not only of Mossad and the IDF, but also the B’nai Brith, the Anti-Defamation League, and the Mega Group. The job of cleaning house would also put him into conflict with powerful mobsters like Leslie Wexner, the Bronfmans, and a whole helluvalotta other powerful people, many of whom happen to be Zionists.

If he’s really doing that, he’s got more balls than brains, and I encourage his family members to cherish the time that they have left with him.

WHY I HAVE MY DOUBTS

After reading One Nation Under Blackmail, Whitney Webb’s recently-published journalistic masterpiece, I am convinced that there is significant overlap between Mossad, the C.I.A., and intergenerational organized crime.

According to Webb, Jeffrey Epstein had ties to both Israeli and American intelligence agencies, as well as to a pro-Israel philanthropist faction known as “the Mega Group.” She explains:

The Mega Group’s role in the Epstein case has garnered some attention, as Epstein’s main financial patron for decades, billionaire Leslie Wexner, was a co-founder of the group that unites several well-known businessmen with a penchant for pro-Israel and ethno-philanthropy (i.e., philanthropy benefiting a single ethnic or ethno-religious group).

She goes on to reveal that members of the Mega Group have deep ties to organized crime, specifically the network led by notorious American mobster Meyer Lansky, who was a leading figure in what is known as the “National Crime Syndicate”, which was an alliance between the Italian Mafia and the Jewish Mob.

By virtue of the role of many Mega Group members as major political donors in both the U.S. and Israel, several of its most notable members have close ties to the governments of both countries as well as their intelligence communities…

[T]he Mega Group also had close ties to two businessmen who worked for Israel’s Mossad — Robert Maxwell and Marc Rich — as well as to top Israeli politicians, including past and present prime ministers with deep ties to Israel’s intelligence community. 

Robert Maxwell, if you didn’t already know, was the father of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s girlfriend and partner in crime.

The elder Maxwell was a larger than life figure who Webb describes as a spymaster, and he appeared to have had ties to Israeli, American, British, and Eastern European intelligence agencies.

As Whitney explains,

Maxwell, who was a business partner of Mega Group co-founder Charles Bronfman, aided the successful Mossad plot to plant a trapdoor in U.S.-created software that was then sold to governments and companies throughout the world.

I could go on and on, but I think that I make my point clear. Jeffrey Epstein obviously did not work alone, and if you look at a list of his accomplices, it’s hard not to notice that a whole hell of a lot of them are diehard Zionists whose families have historic ties to the National Crime Syndicate, as well as the B’nai Brith and the Anti-Defamation League.

Let’s have another look at that debate between RFK and Allan Dershowitz, shall we?

Do my suspicions make more sense now?

The fact of the matter is that Mossad is in bed with organized crime, meaning that the state of Israel should be considered a criminal organization.

If RFK is going to be a “champion of Israel”, I take that to mean that he will uncritically support the criminal dynasty that controls the world’s foremost rogue state.

I stand to be corrected. I hope that I’m wrong.

Thankfully, there’s an easy way to find out. There are quite a few people in the truth movement who are in communication with RFK. We can always just ask him.

Hey, C.J., could you do me a favour, please? Next chance you get, could you please ask Bobby-boy for his professional opinion, as a lawyer, about whether or not the Palestinian people have the right to armed rebellion under international law.

It’s a yes or no question.

SHOULD WE GIVE RFK THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT?

Now, if we were to give RFK the benefit of the doubt, we could perhaps interpret his promise to be a champion of Israel as meaning something other than blindly obeying them, which is the traditional stance of both Democrats and Republicans.

Perhaps he is just “playing the game” and is just saying the things that you need to say in order to stand a chance of getting elected.

Forgive me for my cynicism, but from what I’ve observed in my 35 years on Planet Earth, once politicians start “playing the game”, they don’t stop.

RFK does give every appearance of being an upright and morally righteous person. I’m not saying that he’s not. But I am saying that his position on Israel is of vital importance. If his stance is the same as Biden’s, Trump’s, Obama’s, and Bush’s, that should tell us all we need to know.

But yes, of course, let’s give him the benefit of the doubt. I acknowledge him as a movement hero for exposing Fauci so thoroughly, and he certainly does have my respect for that.

But what does it mean to give someone the benefit of the doubt? It means not jumping to conclusions. It means watching and waiting. In politics, or life in general, it is only a matter of time before some test of one’s professed values will present itself.

And that is exactly what has happened with the case of our modern Jeremiah.

The case of C.J. Hopkins provides RFK with an opportunity to prove that he isn’t afraid to criticize Israel, and to side with a brave dissident who has come under fire for committing the crime of satire.

The accusations against Hopkins are ridiculous, meaning that this oughta be easy.

C.J. is not an anti-semite, and if RFK is completely unwilling to offer the slightest defence of his erstwhile literary hero, I think that will tell us all that we need to know.

There's a sucker born every minute, but I’m not one of them.

Are you?

A QUICK MESSAGE TO RFK

This is a test, Bobby-Boy. You can pass or you can fail. If you pass, I’d be willing to act as an advisor on your campaign. If you fail, you’re gonna lose a lot of respect amongst me and my comrades, and a lot of people will conclude that you’re full of shit.

There’s a few ways you could go about this.

If you really do believe that C.J. is a modern prophet, why not pay for his lawyer? You’d be surprised how much cred that will buy you.

I don’t know how much money he’s got, but I’m sure it’s a lot less than you.

I don’t know how much C.J. is going to have to spend on his lawyer, but I’m guessing that it’ll end up being something like ten thousand dollars, if not more.

This might be hard for you to understand, but ten grand is a lot of money for most people.

If you don’t get that the threat of what basically amounts to a 10K fine will dissuade other writers in Germany from expressing their views, it’s because you’re too rich to understand the experience of ordinary people.

Would it kill you to give C.J. 10K? To you, that’s chump change. Are you really going to miss ten grand?

Or, if you’re one of them types with deep pockets and short arms, maybe you could ask some of your rich friends. I’m guessing Alan Dershowitz could spare a buck or two, couldn’t he? Given that you’re American Royalty, it shouldn’t be too hard to call in a favour or two, should it?

One of the most important skills for a politician is getting rich people to give them money, so if you can’t come up with a measly ten grand, you might want to rethink your career change. Not everyone’s cut out for politics, you know.

If you don’t like my style of friendly extortion, I have an even better idea, too. This one doesn’t involve money, so if you’re one of those rich people who’s not into sharing, maybe this idea will be more to your liking.

Might I suggest, Bobby-boy, that you compare the COVID vax campaign to the Holocaust?

If a prominent political celebrity like yourself were to do such a thing, it would make it more safer for people like C.J. Hopkins to speak up without facing the stress and financial pressure of such a blatant intimidation campaign.

If you were charged criminally for doing such a thing, you could then turn the media circus to your advantage. If you’re running as a dark horse candidate, you’re going to have to be creative, and there’s no such thing as bad publicity. Trump proved that.

You also live in the U.S., not Germany, which means that you’ve got the First Amendment working for you.

Plus, I hear you’ve got a good lawyer.