Once again, Crow, I merely imagine a question in my mind and you fly in to answer it. My stained glass crow, given by my daughter, has fallen a time or two from the window and lost its tail. I'd just considered tossing it. But clearly, the crow is a talisman in my life, messenger of the Goddess, not a parasitic talisman of the usurpers ;-)
Niall Ferguson is a chief propagandist for the usurpers. Even before his role as spokesperson for the lockdowns and vaccines, I'd read his intro to Dambisa Moyo's Dead Aid and wondered how anyone talking such nonsense could be taken seriously. Their point was that 'charitable' aid be replaced by capital investment. Of course, we now have a name for faux-charity with Margaret Anna Alice's philanthropaths and the ruse of USAID, which I've talked about for 18 yrs, has now outlived its usefulness and been discarded. So the strategy, to which Moyo gave an African woman's face, is now in full swing with direct exploitation fashionable. He's good, Ferguson is, I'll give him that!
So your two statements that he's an eminent historian but also a limited hangout should be AND rather than BUT. As the Rothschild's chosen propagandist, his job is to present the truth but twist it. That makes it possible to untwist and figure out the truth.
The question I'd woken up with was which Rothschild loaned Kaiser Wilhelm 100% of the funding to go into the Great War, against the wishes of the Germans? Who was the Rothschild in charge in London and which one in Frankfurt at the time? It's certainly not true that they didn't want war because they'd already made their fortune. Why else would they have funded it?
It's also interesting that the word used to describe them is “the Caucasian royal family” with Ferguson interjecting [Jewish]. Similar to Aryan, this is a word that goes back to the origins of the ruling clan over the Habiru/ Hebrew, Sephardic or AshkeNazis. They're not the same genealogy.
And interesting wording on "the possession of a mysterious “Hebrew talisman” that enabled Nathan Rothschild, the founder of the London house, to become 'the leviathan of the money markets of Europe.'” The leviathan is the symbol of the Goddess, like the dragon, serpent and snake. And curious that the word includes 'levi' like Levites, Luvians, Luwites--from our other conversation.
Niall Ferguson conveniently skips mentioning that the origin of Rothschild wealth came from investing the Hesse fortune and gaining a reputation for honest brokerage for other aristocratic families. They are financial advisors to all the royal houses and the Vatican in particular.
Why was that essential fact overlooked?
Could it be that Ferguson is desperate to preserve the nonsense notion that the Rothschild family is top of the pyramid of power?
Well, I have not read this book and the article to the end, but I do not disagree with N. Ferguson on “Hunter-gatherers do not trade. They raid. Nor do they save, consuming their food as and when they find it. They therefore have no need of money”, but I disagree with him on "The life of a hunter-gatherer is indeed... "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” This depends on the viewpoint. The hunter-gatherers could live on this, and we may not say that they were not happy in their own ways. In the majority of cases today, our charities mainly ignore the personal dignity of people in Africa and Asia but provide only harm to them because they feed and dress them, eliminating the evolution of their own skills.
As you might know, last year now King Charles III was requested to pay one tribe-society for the slavery, exemplified by the USA, though Britain never exercised it over there. Why work if useful idiots give us enough for whatever reasons of theirs?
Yes, "He also focuses on the terrible effects of usury but ultimately concludes that we should ultimately be grateful to usurers because without them, we’d still be living in the Dark Age”s. What is wrong with this? The European knights, when occupying Byzantium, learnt about bookkeeping from the Greek Jews, who were masters of usury. This was one of the cornerstones of knowledge for every industrial revolution.were masters of usury. This was one of the cornestone knowledhe for evey industrial revolution.
Once again, Crow, I merely imagine a question in my mind and you fly in to answer it. My stained glass crow, given by my daughter, has fallen a time or two from the window and lost its tail. I'd just considered tossing it. But clearly, the crow is a talisman in my life, messenger of the Goddess, not a parasitic talisman of the usurpers ;-)
Niall Ferguson is a chief propagandist for the usurpers. Even before his role as spokesperson for the lockdowns and vaccines, I'd read his intro to Dambisa Moyo's Dead Aid and wondered how anyone talking such nonsense could be taken seriously. Their point was that 'charitable' aid be replaced by capital investment. Of course, we now have a name for faux-charity with Margaret Anna Alice's philanthropaths and the ruse of USAID, which I've talked about for 18 yrs, has now outlived its usefulness and been discarded. So the strategy, to which Moyo gave an African woman's face, is now in full swing with direct exploitation fashionable. He's good, Ferguson is, I'll give him that!
So your two statements that he's an eminent historian but also a limited hangout should be AND rather than BUT. As the Rothschild's chosen propagandist, his job is to present the truth but twist it. That makes it possible to untwist and figure out the truth.
The question I'd woken up with was which Rothschild loaned Kaiser Wilhelm 100% of the funding to go into the Great War, against the wishes of the Germans? Who was the Rothschild in charge in London and which one in Frankfurt at the time? It's certainly not true that they didn't want war because they'd already made their fortune. Why else would they have funded it?
It's also interesting that the word used to describe them is “the Caucasian royal family” with Ferguson interjecting [Jewish]. Similar to Aryan, this is a word that goes back to the origins of the ruling clan over the Habiru/ Hebrew, Sephardic or AshkeNazis. They're not the same genealogy.
And interesting wording on "the possession of a mysterious “Hebrew talisman” that enabled Nathan Rothschild, the founder of the London house, to become 'the leviathan of the money markets of Europe.'” The leviathan is the symbol of the Goddess, like the dragon, serpent and snake. And curious that the word includes 'levi' like Levites, Luvians, Luwites--from our other conversation.
Thanks again for these juicy tidbits!
Niall Ferguson conveniently skips mentioning that the origin of Rothschild wealth came from investing the Hesse fortune and gaining a reputation for honest brokerage for other aristocratic families. They are financial advisors to all the royal houses and the Vatican in particular.
Why was that essential fact overlooked?
Could it be that Ferguson is desperate to preserve the nonsense notion that the Rothschild family is top of the pyramid of power?
So tired of these lies!
Well, I have not read this book and the article to the end, but I do not disagree with N. Ferguson on “Hunter-gatherers do not trade. They raid. Nor do they save, consuming their food as and when they find it. They therefore have no need of money”, but I disagree with him on "The life of a hunter-gatherer is indeed... "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” This depends on the viewpoint. The hunter-gatherers could live on this, and we may not say that they were not happy in their own ways. In the majority of cases today, our charities mainly ignore the personal dignity of people in Africa and Asia but provide only harm to them because they feed and dress them, eliminating the evolution of their own skills.
As you might know, last year now King Charles III was requested to pay one tribe-society for the slavery, exemplified by the USA, though Britain never exercised it over there. Why work if useful idiots give us enough for whatever reasons of theirs?
Yes, "He also focuses on the terrible effects of usury but ultimately concludes that we should ultimately be grateful to usurers because without them, we’d still be living in the Dark Age”s. What is wrong with this? The European knights, when occupying Byzantium, learnt about bookkeeping from the Greek Jews, who were masters of usury. This was one of the cornerstones of knowledge for every industrial revolution.were masters of usury. This was one of the cornestone knowledhe for evey industrial revolution.
- Michael Poulin
https://www.gata.org/node/8213