Yeah, I can well imagine something like this (rebellion following the offer one can't refuse) would've made up the minds of the savage nobles (well, they're not really noble, obviously, the monsters/globalist cabal I mean, but I wanted an excuse to be pretentiously clever with the wording). So I am right with you on your conspiracy theory about DG. Likewise, maybe I shall have to think cleverly and cunningly myself about what I say and how I say it.
But certainly, in answer to the question 'how did things get unequal' the most obvious psychological (or psychohistorical) answer is that it was 'imposed' on the mass of humanity over a period of several thousand years during the holocene by a very small minority of humanoids who are fundamentally different than (let's call it) the 99%. I'm going to argue their behaviour, and therefore their entire brain patters and functioning, is so different as to constitute a different species. They simply look like humans and parasite off them. But this entire 'conspiracy theory' analysis of history can be reduced to a simple matter of a 'group survival strategy' on the part of this 1% - if the 99% ever got wind of this demonic other then self-defence would take over and the monsters wouldn't survive. Normal human beings, as epitomised by the so-called 'noble savage' (the Americans as described in the essay) are essentially innately morally good (i.e. liberal-minded, altruistic, wary of authority, enlightened, holistic, socialist, anarchist) and all those other positive words that govern normal human behaviour simply because it's more evolutionarily beneficial to be good, and that would've been hard-wired into the brain's very structure and functioning over the course of a million years. The 1%, however, clearly went down a different path, one in which fear governed their behaviour. And that fear is why they need power and control (and money, and property rights, and statism, and so on).
Right, I'll shut up now or I'm going to write a bloody essay in a comment.
But thank you so much for this amazing article (I'm definitely going to have to restack this) - this is precisely the kind of inspiration needed.
So yeah, you're right about the conspiracy theory thing. I'm right with you on that one.
The merits or non-merits of The Dawn of Everything is, well, one thing. I found some parts of it to be great. What I don't see you addressing here is this: soapy taste in mouth (subjective) and organ failure (objective) possibly can be explained not only from poisoning but also from the bioweapon -- the transgenic gene therapy -- masquerading as a "vaccine." We know Graeber was jabbed but how many times? The data shows autoimmune diseases, cancer, return of Covid, and more all grow exponentially with each shot but also that these responses -- compared to that of the unvaccinated -- are there from the first shot. You addressed this briefly in a previous post, I can't remember what you said about it except that you were dwelling on the role his wife possibly could have played in his demise. Doing away with an intellectual for variations in his theories? That sounds like a stretch. As a poet, I can tell you that the basic stance in this phantom culture toward poets and toward intellectuals is to ignore them. Even a "bestselling" anthropologist like Graeber. From the standpoint of hundreds of millions of people, billions of people, who even knows about him or gives a fuck? Now, if we're talking about Taylor Swift being offed for a new album that disappointed whomever among her rabid fans, I could more easily get behind that
This is a fucking exceptional essay.
Yeah, I can well imagine something like this (rebellion following the offer one can't refuse) would've made up the minds of the savage nobles (well, they're not really noble, obviously, the monsters/globalist cabal I mean, but I wanted an excuse to be pretentiously clever with the wording). So I am right with you on your conspiracy theory about DG. Likewise, maybe I shall have to think cleverly and cunningly myself about what I say and how I say it.
But certainly, in answer to the question 'how did things get unequal' the most obvious psychological (or psychohistorical) answer is that it was 'imposed' on the mass of humanity over a period of several thousand years during the holocene by a very small minority of humanoids who are fundamentally different than (let's call it) the 99%. I'm going to argue their behaviour, and therefore their entire brain patters and functioning, is so different as to constitute a different species. They simply look like humans and parasite off them. But this entire 'conspiracy theory' analysis of history can be reduced to a simple matter of a 'group survival strategy' on the part of this 1% - if the 99% ever got wind of this demonic other then self-defence would take over and the monsters wouldn't survive. Normal human beings, as epitomised by the so-called 'noble savage' (the Americans as described in the essay) are essentially innately morally good (i.e. liberal-minded, altruistic, wary of authority, enlightened, holistic, socialist, anarchist) and all those other positive words that govern normal human behaviour simply because it's more evolutionarily beneficial to be good, and that would've been hard-wired into the brain's very structure and functioning over the course of a million years. The 1%, however, clearly went down a different path, one in which fear governed their behaviour. And that fear is why they need power and control (and money, and property rights, and statism, and so on).
Right, I'll shut up now or I'm going to write a bloody essay in a comment.
But thank you so much for this amazing article (I'm definitely going to have to restack this) - this is precisely the kind of inspiration needed.
So yeah, you're right about the conspiracy theory thing. I'm right with you on that one.
The merits or non-merits of The Dawn of Everything is, well, one thing. I found some parts of it to be great. What I don't see you addressing here is this: soapy taste in mouth (subjective) and organ failure (objective) possibly can be explained not only from poisoning but also from the bioweapon -- the transgenic gene therapy -- masquerading as a "vaccine." We know Graeber was jabbed but how many times? The data shows autoimmune diseases, cancer, return of Covid, and more all grow exponentially with each shot but also that these responses -- compared to that of the unvaccinated -- are there from the first shot. You addressed this briefly in a previous post, I can't remember what you said about it except that you were dwelling on the role his wife possibly could have played in his demise. Doing away with an intellectual for variations in his theories? That sounds like a stretch. As a poet, I can tell you that the basic stance in this phantom culture toward poets and toward intellectuals is to ignore them. Even a "bestselling" anthropologist like Graeber. From the standpoint of hundreds of millions of people, billions of people, who even knows about him or gives a fuck? Now, if we're talking about Taylor Swift being offed for a new album that disappointed whomever among her rabid fans, I could more easily get behind that
I'm in awh. Will try to present my influence as well, shortly.