No, I don't think the debate about viruses is over. Dr. Michael Palmer, in conjunction with Dr Sucharit Bakdi, has written 2 articles defending germ theory and viruses in particular. Sandwiched between is a response by virus skeptic Torsten Engelbrecht. I think both sides brought forth important points.
Terrain theory is a psyop, essentially. Miles Mathis explains it quite well, without having to use much science to respond to the anti-virology side's ridiculous assertions. It seems to also be linked to the flat earth psyop.
Interestingly I was doing a bit more medical science research today for an article, and have some ready questions for the anti-virus people.
Obviously pollution causes ill health. That can't be argued with. But here's the first question: Can you tell me how these pollutants trigger the body's release of Interferon?
Let's start there. Then later, if necessary, we can move on to the rest of the exceptionally complex human immune system, which is a product of millions of years of evolution in an environment replete with germs of various kinds (bacteria and viruses).
Oh - I should point out (which Mathis also points out), whilst you can't argue against the existence of bacteria, it is true that viruses don't satisfy Koch's postulates because they are an intra-cellular infection. That's something to remember.
There's also zero point in even engaging with these 'no virus' people given the existence of stuff like 'genome sequencing', which has been carried out on Sars-Cov-2, and even gotten as far as demonstrating which elements of the virus have which effects on which bits and functions of the human body, such as the interferon-suppression effect which many viruses have evolved to get around the human body's primary immune response (Interferon is signalling protein which triggers the immune response cascade, which involves dozens and dozens of downstream pathways).
And did you know, for example, that Ivermectin inhibits the ACE2 receptor binding ability of the infamous spike protein? No wonder they wanted to suppress that off-patent, cheap as chips, safe and effective treatment.
You mention 'specialists' and 'generalists' in which the generalist must be intelligent enough to understand the specialist. Well, I am somewhere in between when it comes to medical science, as I can understand all the specialist jargon.
And of course you have to examine the credentials and competency of the people who express opinions dressed up to look like science. I find it interesting that you can do this rational and common sense approach when it comes to some things, but not for others, like the trans thing, for example, where you seem to just take one view from very biased and somewhat fraudulent, pseudoscientific sources with a clearly fascist agenda. There seems to be a contradiction there, is all I'm saying. Yet when someone knowledgeable comes along, like me for example, that person is dismissed, possibly to avoid having to cast aside the confirmation bias (which is just a fancy term for 'prejudice').
Anyhow, let's start with Interferon, as I say, and go from there.
Oh - and the medieval plagues. How about them. And plagues in ancient times. And... and...
To respond to all your complaints would take several books; and books have already been written.
Just one, for example, addresses plague, which the author, Dr John Perkin was alive to see. "Are Epidemics Contagious?" was published in 1887, the year after he died at the ripe age of 85 after having spent 50 years of his life studying and treating cholera all over the world. It was his last book, though it seems he may have been writing another called "The Volcanic Origin of Epidemics". Dr Parker was the King's Medical Inspector for Cholera in the West Indies.
If you read his book you may need to rethink your assumptions about plague, because it never followed the patterns one would expect from contagion. Further, if you are interested in a good book on the Black Plague in particular, I can recommend Sasha Dobler's "The Black Plague and Abrupt Earth Changes" which is available for free on his website.
I will hopefully get around to reading your suggestions when I have time. I have such a long to-do list!
Initial thoughts, though, which is that a book written in 1887, however erudite, would have known nothing about genetic variations, for example, let alone the complexities of immunology on the biochemical level. Today we not only have extremely powerful microscopes but also genetic sequencing. The Sars-Cov-2 virus, for example (which shares 82% similarity with Sars-Cov-1, interestingly enough), has at least 10 proteins each responsible for repressing a different downstream immune response mechanism, starting with Interferon. And there are 3 types of interferon. The existence of the human immune system itself, a product of millions of years of evolution, is sufficient and incontrovertible proof of germ theory. If germ theory were false, our immune systems would look very, very different. Are you aware of any terrain theorists (or no-germs theorists) who have an explanation for the immune system? If so I'd be very interested to read it.
Obviously I am as angry as the next person about the deceits of covid, especially since the vast majority of the population would've had a cross-resistance and a natural immunity.
I am becoming certain that 'something' was unleashed in 2019/2020, but at multiple sites around the world simultaneously, because 'covid' did not follow the normal rules of epidemiology. There should never have been a 2nd wave, for example. That simply doesn't happen. I would not be surprised in the slightest if the bad guys wanted to test various bioweapons in localised areas and did that under cover of 'covid'. There is some suggestion they are working on ethnicity-specific weapons, for example - this would explain why Russia and China actually took the thing seriously (apparently went along with it, that is).
If we can accept a scenario like that, in which epidemics occur simultaneously in different places, thus violating the rules of natural disease spread (epidemiology), then our first suspicion should be foul play. So perhaps this kind of foul play goes back much further than 2019 or even 1918...
As regards interferon, the only thing I know about cytokine cascades is what I learned from my CIRS doctor. Cytokine cascades as I understand it are part of an inflammatory response and are not specifically related to pathogens.
The "science" on these things is complex. The most I can say is that these are complex hypothesis. The more complex something is, the more difficult it is to penetrate by the ordinary person, which leads to a body of theory that cannot be held accountable by the people--an elite mythology.
You're quite right about cytokines of course, which are indeed responsible for inflammatory processes. But this is just one minor part of the immune system. Interferon, a signalling protein, triggers a lot more pathways, some of which lead to the creation of memory B-cells, which remember all the proteins in a pathogen they've previously encountered. This doesn't happen if the body is simply infected by toxins, which only triggers the 'innate' immune system, not the 'adaptive' immune system, which is what confers immunity.
This, incidentally, is why those mRNA injections were never 'vaccines', because they do not lead to the generation of memory B-cells. The S-protein in a coronavirus is, on its own, just a protein - it is not recognised as a 'living pathogen' - instead it is simply a 'toxin'. This is how we know the jabs were intended as bioweapons, because they train the body's own cells to produce this toxin, whilst preventing the innate immune system from breaking it down (encased in a lipid nanosheath thing), so it triggers the cytokine cascade (storm) for the 'duration of efficacy' namely about 6 months. Then they tell people they need a 'booster' - having 'measured the efficacy by virtue of the detection of antibodies' - but these antibodies are not adaptive system antibodies.
I'm not surprised they need the help of computers to help sequence some genomes, especially when it's quicker. But they usually have comparators available. Anyway, it's eminently possible to infer the existence of pathogens from the immune response, and also to visualise rna or dna sequences under microscopes. I can understand what you mean about most of this stuff being largely impenetrable to the layperson, but there are enough intelligent normal people who can learn this stuff, develop the specialised vocabulary (like I've had to when translating specialist medical stuff), and thus know when they're talking crap or not.
From a psychological point of view, of course, it is simply not possible for the cabal to control every single intelligent normal person with access to a laboratory, thus, they simply can't risk having 'no virus', because someone who didn't get the memo is going to isolate a sample and test it - if they find nothing, then the cabal are in deep doodah. This reasoning goes for a lot of scientific stuff. I mean, sure, there have been times in the past when they clearly didn't think enough about the long-term consequences, like someone finding out in the future, but there are limits to their ability, and they will be acutely aware of those limits. In the case of science, this science was born before the cabal started to gain any control over it. And that's an important point.
Anyway - I will try and dig out some material, seeing as I've been studying this stuff in a bit more detail recently.
Hey… thanks for your answer. I’ve been meaning to get back to you because I assure you that I do appreciate that you are such an avid commenter. I've been pretty preoccupied lately with the MMIWG issue, which is heavy stuff.
When it comes to the trans issue, you and I clearly disagree so strongly I think it will be hard to get anywhere other than agreeing to disagree. But I do consider this an important issue, and I do intend to get into the weeds on it at some point.
I saw that you were miffed in another comment, but I’m confused - I invited you to submit an essay, and I never received anything from you. Why are you mad?
I’m curious - did you see my piece “The Myth of the Queer Savage”? One aspect of the trans thing that I object to is Euro-Americans & Euro-Canadians creating a gay mythology about indigenous cultures revering “Two-Spirit people”. In fact, the “Two-Spirit” designation was invented by white people in 1990, and is not a translation of an equivalent concept from another language. It is purely made-up.
I can understand the preoccupation thing - I've been totally busy myself recently. I think I will have to just bite the bullet and do all the research to write a definitive article about the trans issue. I have a fair amount of material already but it's incomplete and I would want to make it as good as it can be.
I can very much understand what I think you are objecting to about the two spirit thing (I have read your article on that one). I did look it up and found a slightly different version of events, namely there was a conference of sorts in 1990 but the names of those involved were different (so I don't know what's going on there tbh). I also read that the indigenous populations did indeed have pre-colonisation words denoting those who seemed to embody an identity not entirely male or female. Whether this is evidence of gender incongruence in the neuroscientific sense, or simply a social expression/construct, I really don't know.
One thing that's interesting from an anthropological point of view, which only struck me recently, is that if the neuroscientific (as it were) prevalence of gender incongruence is say 1 in 10,000, then if we go back beyond a certain period of history we encounter much smaller population groups, thus the percentage chance of someone with that condition occurring in such a small group is negligible. At least for each group. If one takes, say, 100 groups of 150 people (15,000) then you still have only one, and that person would probably end up as a kind of shamanic figure. So in this sense, the idea of 'queer' or whatever is indeed a 'modern' perception - ancient societies would've interpreted such people in an entirely different, perhaps more spiritual way - there certainly wouldn't have been the same 'controversy' or 'moralising' about it as there has recently been, and it wouldn't have been seen as some kind of psychological condition in the modern materialist sense.
So from that point of view, I agree that I find the idea of modernist, materialist, white Europeans imposing their colonialist ideas onto indigenous populations extremely distasteful. My hunch is they are taking an already existing 'type' and 'redefining' it with some silly new term (two spirit). But my point, really, is that we can't take that as some kind of evidence to say 'such people never existed and it's a myth', because that strikes me as equally patronising and an imposition (not to mention unscientific). In the end, also, it's up to each individual to define who and what they are, and that should be especially true as an anarchist. Meaning I simply can't abide people dictating what people can or can't be.
I do think these so-called 'two spirit' people, however, should maybe get back in touch with their own ancient cultural, spiritual roots, and express themselves in that context, rather than adopting some western-oriented 'queer' identity. It doesn't sit right with the indigenous culture, it seems to me. Kind of incongruent, you know... So I'm sort of with you on that one.
One interesting consideration is that the indigenous languages of Turtle were verb-based, and English in particular is very noun-based. What we have done in recent decades has involved taking an action (same-sex) attraction and turned it into an identity - gay, queer, lesbian, and so on. Would that happen in the same way in verb-based language?
FIELD THEORY, THE COMMON COLD AND PANDEMICS (THERE IS NO VIRUS)
We get seasonal influenza when our cells build up toxins; ingest/inject. We cyclically purge toxins from our body to bring the electromagnetic frequency (EMF) of our cells into balance with the changing EMF in our environment.
THE CATALYSTS
1) Seasonal Earth Tilt
Earth's axis-tilt changes the angular momentum of its electromagnetic field, which, via inductance, re-calibrates our weaker, cellular EMF. All magnetic fields are torroidal in nature. All cells have a weak electrical charge. The Earth has a magnetic field, which, via inductance, shapes the magnetic field of our cells, such as a strong magnet warps/re-aligns the field of a weaker magnet. Field Theory is not just hypothesis.
New, wide-spread EMF tech precedes all "pandemics"; an undeniable fact, which includes the COV-2 “pandemic” that started when Wuhan launched/activated the first city-wide 5G towers in China. When environmental electromagnetic frequencies/polarity change, it causes, via inductance, the body to re-calibrate EMF/polarity on a molecular level, which triggers a natural detox process/cycle that brings cellular EMF of our cells into homeostasis with our environment.
PANDEMICS CAUSED BY EMF INDUCTION
1918: Spanish Flu - The flu Exploded with the distribution of WW1 radio comm / Ten million Bell phones in service across US by 1918.
1957: Asian Flu - Hong Kong television began May 1957
2003: SARS - From 2002-2003, 3G networks launched globally
Real sudden death numbers (stats): Global shipments of smart phones down 4% annually since 2020 (hundreds of millions), huge drop in telecom + movie streaming subscribers. With openvaers.com stats factored in, we get 600 million dead and injured. Factor in declining birth rate (vaxx induced), we get 2.8% annual loss of global population that adds up to billions in the next 5-10 years. Death in correction facilities are up 56% since 2019.
I try to be very careful to not judge people on Substack because it's so easy to misinterpret and/or not get sarcasm. So I admit that I'm not really sure where you stand. Here's where I stand: Covid is a disease caused by a virus that is highly contagious and spreads quickly. Covid vaccines are safe, effective, have been rigorously monitored and evaluated, and have saved millions of lives. Colds are caused by hundreds of different viruses and are highly contagious. And yes, pollution causes illness. I'm not certain how much of this you agree with or disagree with. Not that it matters a hoot whether we agree or not. 😀
I have seen a this and another article by the Nature Institute before. I appreciate their apparent objectivity. As for Cowan's "The Contagion Myth", I have not read it. I find that Cowan, at least in oral presentation, is not that clear or precise in his wording. Andrew Kaufman, on the other hand, I find to be very calm, clear and methodical.
Elementary, dear Watson. Well, first you need a large budget for expensive machinery that only highly qualified weirdos with poor social skills are able to obtain the correct results from. Next you need to make the surface of your mind flat and smooth like baby's bottom. Then realize that the surface of your mind has no end, and there is probably spherical or something. Then hire a team of lawyers and sue anyone who contradicts you. Also, you could try accusing them of being a rapist or gay or a pedophile or a furry secretly into monster erotica or embezzlement or adrenochrome or whatever. If that doesn't work, accuse their wife of being a man.
sorry, I lol'ed because I'm always getting hit with "well if viruses aren't real, then what about (insert disease here)." The honest answer is I don't know. I'm not a doctor. I'm a reporter who has been following the action from the sidelines. But I guess I tend towards a holistic view of medicine which eschews overly-reductive views vis-a-vis the cause of various illnesses. IMHO the best way to avoid illness is to be healthy, and the best way to be healthy to get exercise, get enough sleep, not over-indulge, having a healthy social life, and (relative) freedom from the stresses produced by poverty and fear.
We have identified the flaws with the virology model. We are not currently proposing a giant new model to replace it.
That will come in time, after the paradigm shift.
Tobin's article focuses on respiratory illnesses, and chickenpox is a skin disease. So I'm not sure that Tobin's analysis is directly relevant to your question. Maybe he'll have an answer for you though...
Love your introduction, Crow. Beautifully done!
No, I don't think the debate about viruses is over. Dr. Michael Palmer, in conjunction with Dr Sucharit Bakdi, has written 2 articles defending germ theory and viruses in particular. Sandwiched between is a response by virus skeptic Torsten Engelbrecht. I think both sides brought forth important points.
http://mileswmathis.com/terrain.pdf
Terrain theory is a psyop, essentially. Miles Mathis explains it quite well, without having to use much science to respond to the anti-virology side's ridiculous assertions. It seems to also be linked to the flat earth psyop.
Interestingly I was doing a bit more medical science research today for an article, and have some ready questions for the anti-virus people.
Obviously pollution causes ill health. That can't be argued with. But here's the first question: Can you tell me how these pollutants trigger the body's release of Interferon?
Let's start there. Then later, if necessary, we can move on to the rest of the exceptionally complex human immune system, which is a product of millions of years of evolution in an environment replete with germs of various kinds (bacteria and viruses).
Oh - I should point out (which Mathis also points out), whilst you can't argue against the existence of bacteria, it is true that viruses don't satisfy Koch's postulates because they are an intra-cellular infection. That's something to remember.
There's also zero point in even engaging with these 'no virus' people given the existence of stuff like 'genome sequencing', which has been carried out on Sars-Cov-2, and even gotten as far as demonstrating which elements of the virus have which effects on which bits and functions of the human body, such as the interferon-suppression effect which many viruses have evolved to get around the human body's primary immune response (Interferon is signalling protein which triggers the immune response cascade, which involves dozens and dozens of downstream pathways).
And did you know, for example, that Ivermectin inhibits the ACE2 receptor binding ability of the infamous spike protein? No wonder they wanted to suppress that off-patent, cheap as chips, safe and effective treatment.
You mention 'specialists' and 'generalists' in which the generalist must be intelligent enough to understand the specialist. Well, I am somewhere in between when it comes to medical science, as I can understand all the specialist jargon.
And of course you have to examine the credentials and competency of the people who express opinions dressed up to look like science. I find it interesting that you can do this rational and common sense approach when it comes to some things, but not for others, like the trans thing, for example, where you seem to just take one view from very biased and somewhat fraudulent, pseudoscientific sources with a clearly fascist agenda. There seems to be a contradiction there, is all I'm saying. Yet when someone knowledgeable comes along, like me for example, that person is dismissed, possibly to avoid having to cast aside the confirmation bias (which is just a fancy term for 'prejudice').
Anyhow, let's start with Interferon, as I say, and go from there.
Oh - and the medieval plagues. How about them. And plagues in ancient times. And... and...
To respond to all your complaints would take several books; and books have already been written.
Just one, for example, addresses plague, which the author, Dr John Perkin was alive to see. "Are Epidemics Contagious?" was published in 1887, the year after he died at the ripe age of 85 after having spent 50 years of his life studying and treating cholera all over the world. It was his last book, though it seems he may have been writing another called "The Volcanic Origin of Epidemics". Dr Parker was the King's Medical Inspector for Cholera in the West Indies.
If you read his book you may need to rethink your assumptions about plague, because it never followed the patterns one would expect from contagion. Further, if you are interested in a good book on the Black Plague in particular, I can recommend Sasha Dobler's "The Black Plague and Abrupt Earth Changes" which is available for free on his website.
I will hopefully get around to reading your suggestions when I have time. I have such a long to-do list!
Initial thoughts, though, which is that a book written in 1887, however erudite, would have known nothing about genetic variations, for example, let alone the complexities of immunology on the biochemical level. Today we not only have extremely powerful microscopes but also genetic sequencing. The Sars-Cov-2 virus, for example (which shares 82% similarity with Sars-Cov-1, interestingly enough), has at least 10 proteins each responsible for repressing a different downstream immune response mechanism, starting with Interferon. And there are 3 types of interferon. The existence of the human immune system itself, a product of millions of years of evolution, is sufficient and incontrovertible proof of germ theory. If germ theory were false, our immune systems would look very, very different. Are you aware of any terrain theorists (or no-germs theorists) who have an explanation for the immune system? If so I'd be very interested to read it.
Obviously I am as angry as the next person about the deceits of covid, especially since the vast majority of the population would've had a cross-resistance and a natural immunity.
I am becoming certain that 'something' was unleashed in 2019/2020, but at multiple sites around the world simultaneously, because 'covid' did not follow the normal rules of epidemiology. There should never have been a 2nd wave, for example. That simply doesn't happen. I would not be surprised in the slightest if the bad guys wanted to test various bioweapons in localised areas and did that under cover of 'covid'. There is some suggestion they are working on ethnicity-specific weapons, for example - this would explain why Russia and China actually took the thing seriously (apparently went along with it, that is).
If we can accept a scenario like that, in which epidemics occur simultaneously in different places, thus violating the rules of natural disease spread (epidemiology), then our first suspicion should be foul play. So perhaps this kind of foul play goes back much further than 2019 or even 1918...
Genome sequencing, particularly when it comes to what are later claimed to be viruses, leaves much to be desired.
Specifically with regards to the first in silico genome synthesis of what has come to be known as "SARS-CoV2", see "Structural analysis
of sequence data in
virology
An elementary
approach using SARS-
CoV-2 as an example"
https://www.scribd.com/document/558561065/structural-analysis-of-sequence-data-in-virology-tables-and-figures
As regards interferon, the only thing I know about cytokine cascades is what I learned from my CIRS doctor. Cytokine cascades as I understand it are part of an inflammatory response and are not specifically related to pathogens.
The "science" on these things is complex. The most I can say is that these are complex hypothesis. The more complex something is, the more difficult it is to penetrate by the ordinary person, which leads to a body of theory that cannot be held accountable by the people--an elite mythology.
You're quite right about cytokines of course, which are indeed responsible for inflammatory processes. But this is just one minor part of the immune system. Interferon, a signalling protein, triggers a lot more pathways, some of which lead to the creation of memory B-cells, which remember all the proteins in a pathogen they've previously encountered. This doesn't happen if the body is simply infected by toxins, which only triggers the 'innate' immune system, not the 'adaptive' immune system, which is what confers immunity.
This, incidentally, is why those mRNA injections were never 'vaccines', because they do not lead to the generation of memory B-cells. The S-protein in a coronavirus is, on its own, just a protein - it is not recognised as a 'living pathogen' - instead it is simply a 'toxin'. This is how we know the jabs were intended as bioweapons, because they train the body's own cells to produce this toxin, whilst preventing the innate immune system from breaking it down (encased in a lipid nanosheath thing), so it triggers the cytokine cascade (storm) for the 'duration of efficacy' namely about 6 months. Then they tell people they need a 'booster' - having 'measured the efficacy by virtue of the detection of antibodies' - but these antibodies are not adaptive system antibodies.
I'm not surprised they need the help of computers to help sequence some genomes, especially when it's quicker. But they usually have comparators available. Anyway, it's eminently possible to infer the existence of pathogens from the immune response, and also to visualise rna or dna sequences under microscopes. I can understand what you mean about most of this stuff being largely impenetrable to the layperson, but there are enough intelligent normal people who can learn this stuff, develop the specialised vocabulary (like I've had to when translating specialist medical stuff), and thus know when they're talking crap or not.
From a psychological point of view, of course, it is simply not possible for the cabal to control every single intelligent normal person with access to a laboratory, thus, they simply can't risk having 'no virus', because someone who didn't get the memo is going to isolate a sample and test it - if they find nothing, then the cabal are in deep doodah. This reasoning goes for a lot of scientific stuff. I mean, sure, there have been times in the past when they clearly didn't think enough about the long-term consequences, like someone finding out in the future, but there are limits to their ability, and they will be acutely aware of those limits. In the case of science, this science was born before the cabal started to gain any control over it. And that's an important point.
Anyway - I will try and dig out some material, seeing as I've been studying this stuff in a bit more detail recently.
Hey… thanks for your answer. I’ve been meaning to get back to you because I assure you that I do appreciate that you are such an avid commenter. I've been pretty preoccupied lately with the MMIWG issue, which is heavy stuff.
When it comes to the trans issue, you and I clearly disagree so strongly I think it will be hard to get anywhere other than agreeing to disagree. But I do consider this an important issue, and I do intend to get into the weeds on it at some point.
I saw that you were miffed in another comment, but I’m confused - I invited you to submit an essay, and I never received anything from you. Why are you mad?
I’m curious - did you see my piece “The Myth of the Queer Savage”? One aspect of the trans thing that I object to is Euro-Americans & Euro-Canadians creating a gay mythology about indigenous cultures revering “Two-Spirit people”. In fact, the “Two-Spirit” designation was invented by white people in 1990, and is not a translation of an equivalent concept from another language. It is purely made-up.
I can understand the preoccupation thing - I've been totally busy myself recently. I think I will have to just bite the bullet and do all the research to write a definitive article about the trans issue. I have a fair amount of material already but it's incomplete and I would want to make it as good as it can be.
I can very much understand what I think you are objecting to about the two spirit thing (I have read your article on that one). I did look it up and found a slightly different version of events, namely there was a conference of sorts in 1990 but the names of those involved were different (so I don't know what's going on there tbh). I also read that the indigenous populations did indeed have pre-colonisation words denoting those who seemed to embody an identity not entirely male or female. Whether this is evidence of gender incongruence in the neuroscientific sense, or simply a social expression/construct, I really don't know.
One thing that's interesting from an anthropological point of view, which only struck me recently, is that if the neuroscientific (as it were) prevalence of gender incongruence is say 1 in 10,000, then if we go back beyond a certain period of history we encounter much smaller population groups, thus the percentage chance of someone with that condition occurring in such a small group is negligible. At least for each group. If one takes, say, 100 groups of 150 people (15,000) then you still have only one, and that person would probably end up as a kind of shamanic figure. So in this sense, the idea of 'queer' or whatever is indeed a 'modern' perception - ancient societies would've interpreted such people in an entirely different, perhaps more spiritual way - there certainly wouldn't have been the same 'controversy' or 'moralising' about it as there has recently been, and it wouldn't have been seen as some kind of psychological condition in the modern materialist sense.
So from that point of view, I agree that I find the idea of modernist, materialist, white Europeans imposing their colonialist ideas onto indigenous populations extremely distasteful. My hunch is they are taking an already existing 'type' and 'redefining' it with some silly new term (two spirit). But my point, really, is that we can't take that as some kind of evidence to say 'such people never existed and it's a myth', because that strikes me as equally patronising and an imposition (not to mention unscientific). In the end, also, it's up to each individual to define who and what they are, and that should be especially true as an anarchist. Meaning I simply can't abide people dictating what people can or can't be.
I do think these so-called 'two spirit' people, however, should maybe get back in touch with their own ancient cultural, spiritual roots, and express themselves in that context, rather than adopting some western-oriented 'queer' identity. It doesn't sit right with the indigenous culture, it seems to me. Kind of incongruent, you know... So I'm sort of with you on that one.
One interesting consideration is that the indigenous languages of Turtle were verb-based, and English in particular is very noun-based. What we have done in recent decades has involved taking an action (same-sex) attraction and turned it into an identity - gay, queer, lesbian, and so on. Would that happen in the same way in verb-based language?
Crap. I can’t post an image or meme.
1200+ SIDE EFFECTS OF THE COV-2 VAXX, AS RELEASED IN COURT - 45 OF WHICH ARE DEATH (SUDDEN DEATH) - 40 ARE CANCER: https://vaccinadead.com/pfizer-vaccine-side-effects/
FIELD THEORY, THE COMMON COLD AND PANDEMICS (THERE IS NO VIRUS)
We get seasonal influenza when our cells build up toxins; ingest/inject. We cyclically purge toxins from our body to bring the electromagnetic frequency (EMF) of our cells into balance with the changing EMF in our environment.
THE CATALYSTS
1) Seasonal Earth Tilt
Earth's axis-tilt changes the angular momentum of its electromagnetic field, which, via inductance, re-calibrates our weaker, cellular EMF. All magnetic fields are torroidal in nature. All cells have a weak electrical charge. The Earth has a magnetic field, which, via inductance, shapes the magnetic field of our cells, such as a strong magnet warps/re-aligns the field of a weaker magnet. Field Theory is not just hypothesis.
• Earth Seasonal EMF = Flu (No Virus): https://talknet.substack.com/p/earth-seasonal-emf-flu-no-virus-from
2) New EMF Tech
New, wide-spread EMF tech precedes all "pandemics"; an undeniable fact, which includes the COV-2 “pandemic” that started when Wuhan launched/activated the first city-wide 5G towers in China. When environmental electromagnetic frequencies/polarity change, it causes, via inductance, the body to re-calibrate EMF/polarity on a molecular level, which triggers a natural detox process/cycle that brings cellular EMF of our cells into homeostasis with our environment.
PANDEMICS CAUSED BY EMF INDUCTION
1918: Spanish Flu - The flu Exploded with the distribution of WW1 radio comm / Ten million Bell phones in service across US by 1918.
1957: Asian Flu - Hong Kong television began May 1957
2003: SARS - From 2002-2003, 3G networks launched globally
2019: COVID-19 - Wuhan activated 1,580 5G towers mid-October, 2019. 5G deployed worldwide 2019.
• Spanish Flu, SARS, COVID-19 Followed the Same Pattern/Expansion as Radio, 3G, 5G: https://talknet.substack.com/p/spanish-flu-sars-covid-19-followed
3) Injected/Ingested Toxins
• Vaxx to Kill/Disable Billions Over 10-15 Years (As of 2020): https://talknet.substack.com/p/vaxx-to-killdisable-billions-over
• Vaccines are Catalysts for all Autoimmune Diseases: https://talknet.substack.com/p/vaccines-cause-autoimmune-diseases
• Vaxxed Biology is Programmable via DNA Nanoantennas, Graphine, Luciferase, 5G to Controls Gene Expression, Cell Signaling and Cellular Processes: https://talknet.substack.com/p/cov-2-vaxxed-biology-programmable
REAL DEATH STATS
Close to 600 Million dead and injured and then this came out: https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-james-thorp-585-million-global?publication_id=581065
Real sudden death numbers (stats): Global shipments of smart phones down 4% annually since 2020 (hundreds of millions), huge drop in telecom + movie streaming subscribers. With openvaers.com stats factored in, we get 600 million dead and injured. Factor in declining birth rate (vaxx induced), we get 2.8% annual loss of global population that adds up to billions in the next 5-10 years. Death in correction facilities are up 56% since 2019.
• 180 vaxxed Canadians doctors have died SUDDENLY - https://www.europereloaded.com/180-canadians-doctors-have-died-suddenly/
MY PERSONAL SELF-HEALING INSIGHTS - I'M NOT A DR. BUT MAYBE THAT'S A GOOD THING FOR NOW
• Practical Self-Healing Insight - RIFE, Autophagy, Energy, Frequency, Stem Cells
https://talknet.substack.com/p/practical-self-healing-insight-rife
I try to be very careful to not judge people on Substack because it's so easy to misinterpret and/or not get sarcasm. So I admit that I'm not really sure where you stand. Here's where I stand: Covid is a disease caused by a virus that is highly contagious and spreads quickly. Covid vaccines are safe, effective, have been rigorously monitored and evaluated, and have saved millions of lives. Colds are caused by hundreds of different viruses and are highly contagious. And yes, pollution causes illness. I'm not certain how much of this you agree with or disagree with. Not that it matters a hoot whether we agree or not. 😀
This little article is also worth reading, with regards to debunking the terrain theorists: https://www.natureinstitute.org/article/craig-holdrege-and-jon-mcalice/some-comments-on-the-contagion-myth
I have seen a this and another article by the Nature Institute before. I appreciate their apparent objectivity. As for Cowan's "The Contagion Myth", I have not read it. I find that Cowan, at least in oral presentation, is not that clear or precise in his wording. Andrew Kaufman, on the other hand, I find to be very calm, clear and methodical.
What is the complicated pseudo scientiphic fizakle astro physiometalogical equation that explains an object that is both flat and hollow?
Elementary, dear Watson. Well, first you need a large budget for expensive machinery that only highly qualified weirdos with poor social skills are able to obtain the correct results from. Next you need to make the surface of your mind flat and smooth like baby's bottom. Then realize that the surface of your mind has no end, and there is probably spherical or something. Then hire a team of lawyers and sue anyone who contradicts you. Also, you could try accusing them of being a rapist or gay or a pedophile or a furry secretly into monster erotica or embezzlement or adrenochrome or whatever. If that doesn't work, accuse their wife of being a man.
Any questions?
But I am saving your response. Good writing.
Love it!
But what about chickenpox?
sorry, I lol'ed because I'm always getting hit with "well if viruses aren't real, then what about (insert disease here)." The honest answer is I don't know. I'm not a doctor. I'm a reporter who has been following the action from the sidelines. But I guess I tend towards a holistic view of medicine which eschews overly-reductive views vis-a-vis the cause of various illnesses. IMHO the best way to avoid illness is to be healthy, and the best way to be healthy to get exercise, get enough sleep, not over-indulge, having a healthy social life, and (relative) freedom from the stresses produced by poverty and fear.
We have identified the flaws with the virology model. We are not currently proposing a giant new model to replace it.
That will come in time, after the paradigm shift.
Tobin's article focuses on respiratory illnesses, and chickenpox is a skin disease. So I'm not sure that Tobin's analysis is directly relevant to your question. Maybe he'll have an answer for you though...
No, I know, was just wondering about how it could be explained otherwise
There are ideas about that. It's not something I've spent a lot of time looking at but I believe you can find articles on chickenpox on viroliegy.com
Sam Bailey has also done a video on chickenpox. See drsambailey.com
What about it?
lol.