3 Comments

LOL. Now where on earth did you get that idea from?

The only thing I'd say on that subject is that unless they had some secret weapon that's still a secret, there's no conventional explosive that could have produced those results. The closest to that is what Russia recently introduced to the battlefield, which is similar to the fuel-air bombs the US used in Iraq. Lethal to anyone within 1 km of the explosion because of the pressure wave, but definitely not enough to knock out a city of 1/4M people.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JNzuyNiuYQ

I guess you could argue that bomb #2 wasn't actually a hydrogen bomb but simply a larger version of bomb #1. What really stands out about the whole thing is how a movie about Barbie competes for attention with a film about Oppenheimer, to the point you see nonsense like this in a major daily:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/02/movies/barbenheimer-barbie-vs-oppenheimer.html

There actually may be a connection though. I'm pretty sure the OSS would have used Barbies to compromise any politician or scientist opposed to their plans, since back then cheating on you wife was still a big deal.

Expand full comment

- NO nukes on Hiroshima & Nagasaki,

- NO moon landing,

- NO viruses,

- NO genocide in Gaza,

- NO doubt about WHO and WEF's final intentions,

- NO crisis,

NO, NO, NO, NO ... ???

Expand full comment