yeah, I hope I wasn't too disrespectful to Jane Goodall... after all she really has lived an incredible life... she was a wispy young woman who travelled deep into Africa and studying chimpanzees more deeply than any human ever had. She seems quite sincere, to be honest... I'm not sure if she meant to start a chimp war... doesn't seem like she would be the type to start a chimp war... then again, how good am I at spotting the chimp-war-starting type? I don't know...
Maybe during the long periods she lived outside of human society, she's lost the feeling of how bad things have developed in modern mass-societies. She just seems to be "well-meaning", sorta borderline credulous or gullible ... Nobody is free from making mistakes ... so maybe, it's me who's wrong here 🤔🤔🤔
What is less wispy but reproachable instead is, that in spite of her age and experience she should have by now, she currently participates in WEF-talks about overpopulation which is utter bollocks knowing that the 1-%ers own and use 46%, but a whopping 55% of the planet's population just call a mere 1% of assets/resources their own ...
well, that's why I brought up the Big Foot stuff. Makes you wonder about her judgement, doesn't it? I'm pretty sure Big Foot stories are mostly the result of natives playing jokes on white people. Sasquatches are spiritual beings, not animals that leave droppings.
"Daimonic Reality by Patrick Harpur examines UFOs and a wide variety of “paranormal” phenomena from a rather unique angle. Although Harpur never fully defines the daimonic—“the daimonic that can be defined is not the true daimonic,” as Lao-Tse would say—it seems to exist both inside us and outside us. Like the Greek daemon and unlike the Christian demon, it takes both good/healing and bad/terrifying forms, depending on our commitment to rationalistic ego states.
In a sense, the daimonic is like the collective unconscious of Carl Jung, inside us as a part of our total self that the ego wishes to deny, outside us in all the other humans who ever existed and in the dreams, myths, and arts of all the world. But Harpur follows Irish poet (and Golden Dawn alumnus) W. B. Yeats as often as he follows Jung, and traces some of his ideas back to Giordano Bruno and the alchemical/hermetic mystics of the Renaissance. The daimonic is just a bit more personalized and individualized than Jung’s species unconscious.
Harpur’s major thesis is that unless we recognize the daimonic (make friends with it, Jung would say) it takes increasingly malignant and terrifying forms. For instance, the Greys of UFO abduction lore, he says, are deliberately mirroring our ego-centered and “scientistic” age—showing no emotions of the humans they experiment upon, just as the ideal science student feels no emotion and has no concern with the emotions of the animal being tortured in his laboratory."
Despite dealing with many subjects common to conspiracy theories, this book does not quite fit into that category. We are the conspirators, so to speak. We have repressed the most creative part of ourselves and now it is escaping in terrifying forms."
That's a great comment. I know of a similar idea in that the 'manifestations' reflect the culture of the observer. So whereas in, say, a pagan culture one might see forest spirits like will o' the wisps and such like, in America people see UFOs. I think there's a lot in that when it comes to the paranormal.
And I totally agree about 'making friends' with the daimonic - it's often the case that they would probably be more anxious about humans, given a fearful attitude of humans (thus more likely to have been seen in ancient times). I'm a big fan of Jung in that regard.
Then again, with regards to alien abductions, I am of the opinion that this was simply a cover story for MK-Ultra abductions & experiments on unwitting victims (with further cover provided by Bluebook). It fits perfectly with what you said about 'showing no emotions for the humans they experiment on' - and it's also the case that they'd be pumping the victims full of hallucinogens and, even, dressing up as Greys or pretending to be Dr. Mengele. And it's certainly true that stuff like the Disclosure Project and the 'Exopolitics Institute' is a controlled opposition psyop-type thing.
"If anyone is wondering why the C.I.A. would sponsor a primatologist, it’s because Jane Goodall’s research portrayed chimpanzees as violent, warlike savage..."
I thought that was the job of MSNBC spook commentators who either warmonger nonstop, or display "investigative" crime dramas depicting the lowlife nature of humanity.
That's a really great post. And I love that excerpt, especially because he makes the same points I've made - like up until the agricultural revolution there were so few people compared to the living space and resources that there'd be no conflict.
One think I do find intriguing about Goodall's banana box experiment (let's assume it was deliberate) is that it precisely mirrors the tactics employed by neoliberalism/globalism to maintain social control - namely artificial scarcity. That's to say, restricting the availability of resources. This is what I've come to call the musical chairs version of economics. I may have mentioned that before, actually.
Then again, children playing musical chairs are quite civil about it, aren't they? Hmm. Maybe that's a form of conditioning.
So I think, in review, that Goodall was a fully paid up member. No one can be that stupid as to not reach the conclusion that these chimps are naturally peaceful, unless circumstances change.
And as you say, the bad guys really do need to control the narrative about bellicose humans. You said it right right at the outset!
Goodall's judgment is suspect. Getting behind the culling of the human species is diabolical...throw in the Big Foot commentary, and you have a genuine psycho babble brain scrabble ...Kman, DIGILEAK
NICE post !! Thanks a lot ...👍👍
Perceptual design for the sole interests of a small "elite", even via expert-literature, is just part of the larger playbook ...
Hollywood has created many niches and crannies ...
yeah, I hope I wasn't too disrespectful to Jane Goodall... after all she really has lived an incredible life... she was a wispy young woman who travelled deep into Africa and studying chimpanzees more deeply than any human ever had. She seems quite sincere, to be honest... I'm not sure if she meant to start a chimp war... doesn't seem like she would be the type to start a chimp war... then again, how good am I at spotting the chimp-war-starting type? I don't know...
Maybe during the long periods she lived outside of human society, she's lost the feeling of how bad things have developed in modern mass-societies. She just seems to be "well-meaning", sorta borderline credulous or gullible ... Nobody is free from making mistakes ... so maybe, it's me who's wrong here 🤔🤔🤔
What is less wispy but reproachable instead is, that in spite of her age and experience she should have by now, she currently participates in WEF-talks about overpopulation which is utter bollocks knowing that the 1-%ers own and use 46%, but a whopping 55% of the planet's population just call a mere 1% of assets/resources their own ...
well, that's why I brought up the Big Foot stuff. Makes you wonder about her judgement, doesn't it? I'm pretty sure Big Foot stories are mostly the result of natives playing jokes on white people. Sasquatches are spiritual beings, not animals that leave droppings.
👍👍
Apparently droppings of spiritual beings can morph into mental-crap keeping busy some areas of white men's gullible physical gray-matter ... 🤣🤣
Yeah they've been pushing bullshit about human and animal nature for ever. Religion started that first 😂.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/the-milgram-experiment-and-how-we
Funny how the Bigfoot story was told to us like it was something hidden from us... Same with UFOs etc.... But yet both have scant evidence.
https://library.lol/main/F0FFF93E5BDCCCD182B46BCC074E05BB
"Daimonic Reality by Patrick Harpur examines UFOs and a wide variety of “paranormal” phenomena from a rather unique angle. Although Harpur never fully defines the daimonic—“the daimonic that can be defined is not the true daimonic,” as Lao-Tse would say—it seems to exist both inside us and outside us. Like the Greek daemon and unlike the Christian demon, it takes both good/healing and bad/terrifying forms, depending on our commitment to rationalistic ego states.
In a sense, the daimonic is like the collective unconscious of Carl Jung, inside us as a part of our total self that the ego wishes to deny, outside us in all the other humans who ever existed and in the dreams, myths, and arts of all the world. But Harpur follows Irish poet (and Golden Dawn alumnus) W. B. Yeats as often as he follows Jung, and traces some of his ideas back to Giordano Bruno and the alchemical/hermetic mystics of the Renaissance. The daimonic is just a bit more personalized and individualized than Jung’s species unconscious.
Harpur’s major thesis is that unless we recognize the daimonic (make friends with it, Jung would say) it takes increasingly malignant and terrifying forms. For instance, the Greys of UFO abduction lore, he says, are deliberately mirroring our ego-centered and “scientistic” age—showing no emotions of the humans they experiment upon, just as the ideal science student feels no emotion and has no concern with the emotions of the animal being tortured in his laboratory."
Despite dealing with many subjects common to conspiracy theories, this book does not quite fit into that category. We are the conspirators, so to speak. We have repressed the most creative part of ourselves and now it is escaping in terrifying forms."
That's a great comment. I know of a similar idea in that the 'manifestations' reflect the culture of the observer. So whereas in, say, a pagan culture one might see forest spirits like will o' the wisps and such like, in America people see UFOs. I think there's a lot in that when it comes to the paranormal.
And I totally agree about 'making friends' with the daimonic - it's often the case that they would probably be more anxious about humans, given a fearful attitude of humans (thus more likely to have been seen in ancient times). I'm a big fan of Jung in that regard.
Then again, with regards to alien abductions, I am of the opinion that this was simply a cover story for MK-Ultra abductions & experiments on unwitting victims (with further cover provided by Bluebook). It fits perfectly with what you said about 'showing no emotions for the humans they experiment on' - and it's also the case that they'd be pumping the victims full of hallucinogens and, even, dressing up as Greys or pretending to be Dr. Mengele. And it's certainly true that stuff like the Disclosure Project and the 'Exopolitics Institute' is a controlled opposition psyop-type thing.
This link is well worth a read for the MK-Ultra hypothesis for alien abductions: https://sm4csi.home.xs4all.nl/nwo/MindControl/TheControllers.htm
"If anyone is wondering why the C.I.A. would sponsor a primatologist, it’s because Jane Goodall’s research portrayed chimpanzees as violent, warlike savage..."
I thought that was the job of MSNBC spook commentators who either warmonger nonstop, or display "investigative" crime dramas depicting the lowlife nature of humanity.
That's a really great post. And I love that excerpt, especially because he makes the same points I've made - like up until the agricultural revolution there were so few people compared to the living space and resources that there'd be no conflict.
One think I do find intriguing about Goodall's banana box experiment (let's assume it was deliberate) is that it precisely mirrors the tactics employed by neoliberalism/globalism to maintain social control - namely artificial scarcity. That's to say, restricting the availability of resources. This is what I've come to call the musical chairs version of economics. I may have mentioned that before, actually.
Then again, children playing musical chairs are quite civil about it, aren't they? Hmm. Maybe that's a form of conditioning.
So I think, in review, that Goodall was a fully paid up member. No one can be that stupid as to not reach the conclusion that these chimps are naturally peaceful, unless circumstances change.
And as you say, the bad guys really do need to control the narrative about bellicose humans. You said it right right at the outset!
I like this post!
Goodall's judgment is suspect. Getting behind the culling of the human species is diabolical...throw in the Big Foot commentary, and you have a genuine psycho babble brain scrabble ...Kman, DIGILEAK